Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2016
Students

Cold feet and spreadsheets

Open-access content Wednesday 26th October 2016 — updated 9.57am, Wednesday 6th May 2020

Jessica Elkin wonders how different the choices of the heart and those of the head can be, and which ones are actuaries best qualified for?

2


I love a good wedding, and this year I've been invited to six. Six days of parties with friends and family, champagne, dancing, and watching couples I (thankfully) thoroughly approve of tying the knot. Two of them were the two weekends before my September exam, which felt like a particularly cruel way to celebrate love and partnership. However, they were wonderful, and all's well that ends well - at least, for now. I've not had those results yet.

It's quite a big deal, is marriage. Listening to those vows, it's quite extraordinary all those things you have to do. To have and to hold is fine. For better and in health and all that, fantastic. But in sickness, and poorer, and until death? Goodness. Quite a big ask. You're required to say 'I do' to all of the above, without a single contingency or caveat.

For actuaries, a more precise answer might be, 'I certainly hope so; although there's a material probability that this won't work out. But for the meantime, sure, I'm all for it.' 

Or, alternatively: 'It depends.' But I hear that doesn't usually go down very well.

In theory, an actuary's engagement will be based on sound analysis and the strongest rationale of them all. But actuaries still get divorced. So how does one choose a partner for life?


Not a hitch

Life is full of difficult decisions of varying levels of importance. Should you tip hairdressers? If you meet a friendly dog, how much attention do you have to pay to the owner? When you make eye contact with an approaching colleague, at what point do you acknowledge them and what do you then do to fill in that remaining time before you pass? You can't keep looking them in the eye because that's creepy, but anything else comes across as highly contrived. Day-to-day life is a minefield.

The above leads me to ponder: if I can't answer any of the above questions, how can I make important decisions in situations involving large sums of money, people who rely on me, and my career? A tricky thing about this actuarial set-up of ours is that we are required to use judgment, and to hold ourselves accountable for said judgment.

This is especially difficult for the typical risk-averse personality type so ubiquitous in our line of work.

The IFoA certainly places weight on the importance of judgment. It forms an explicit development heading in our work-based skills requirements, and there was a 'Getting better judgement' working party in 2014 that focused on how we might ensure judgments are good quality, that is, as free from bias as possible. There'll be a presentation on the same topic at the Momentum Conference in December.

The working party examined human behavioural habits to work out ways to avoid common judgment pitfalls in actuarial work. You'll be familiar with some of the behavioural economics side of things if you have studied CT8 - the framing of situations that might lead us to certain conclusions, for example. It certainly acknowledges what a problematic area judgment can be: not only if you're an actuarial student, or an indecisive soul like yours truly, but for all of us.


Working out the knots

As actuaries, many of the decisions we advise on or affect every day will have long-term implications. The good news is that, in accordance with this, our training makes us more qualified to make judgments relating 

to the financial future than the layperson. Which, incidentally, sets such circumstances apart from matters of cultural decorum or those of the heart. That's why actuaries are - sorry - better at technical problems than anything to do with social nuance.

While they're useful, this isn't something that exams will help us with much. I hear that it's experience, especially, that will lead you to be able to make good judgments, and to be confident in making them. So we students can have some comfort not only that judgment is tricky for everyone else, too, but that we'll get better and better at it as our careers unfold. Of course, I only mean this in terms of actuarial work. I can't help on the life partner point. To apply an actuarial approach, the best solution I can think of is to get married multiple times. After all, we all know that the bigger the sample size, the better.

This article appeared in our November 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
Students

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Origination Analyst (Pensions to life)

London, England
£50000 - £80000 per annum + generous bonus + benefits
Reference
145979

Senior Pensions Data Specialist (Nationwide)

England / London, England / Greater Manchester, England, Manchester
£45000 - £80000 per annum + dependent on entry level & bonus
Reference
145978

DC Investment Associate/Consultant

England, London / Scotland / England
£45000 - £80000 per annum + generous bonus + benefits
Reference
145977
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ