Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2022
Opinion

Right on the money

Open-access content Wednesday 31st August 2022
Authors
Nico Aspinall

Does the beauty of economic maths make economists and the mathematically minded more right wing? Nico Aspinall considers the arguments

eazg

As someone who fell in love with beautiful theorems, I’m a sucker for a great proof. Pythagoras’ theorem first showed me which way my heart lay, but it was de Moivre’s theorem that really caught me. A physics degree found me memorising equations for phonons, special relativity and fluid dynamics – gaining joy from learning the maths that explains the universe.

I then discovered that economic maths could be beautiful, too. I loved the financial economics exam CT8 (now part of CM2) so much that I dived deeper with the derivatives exam, ST6 (now SP6). You know you’re getting old as an actuary when they rename your exams!

The interrelated hypotheses of equilibrium, market efficiency and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) provide the pillars of financial economics. If markets are in equilibrium and efficient then, it is said, no individual trader can consistently improve their returns by taking positions away from the market portfolio. Black-Scholes predicts the fair value of an option, and a myriad of portfolio construction techniques allow us to ‘optimise’ to volatility and return.

But here’s the rub: markets are not perfectly efficient. Unlike a mathematical theorem, market efficiency is not a truth that you can build other theorems on.

CAPM, Black-Scholes and portfolio construction work well, but not perfectly. Their beautiful proofs do not make them true. Financial economics provides assumed solutions to assumed formulations of problems, proved on their own terms but not always in reality. Keats was wrong: beauty is not always truth.

Right or left?

In the battle of ideas, we are attracted to simplistic narratives – and political economy is no different. Broadly, on the right of politics, we group together narratives that say the state should be small, the individual free and unencumbered by taxation and regulation, and prices generally set by the competitive market processes. On the left, we group together narratives that say the state should be large, the collective’s interest more important than the individual’s, tax and regulation as high as necessary to support these aims, and prices altered to give incentives to achieve government policy.

I would argue that the simple, beautiful maths of financial economics is aligned with the right. The maths works because markets are assumed to be efficient and government is assumed not to be intervening. Companies are assumed to be profit-maximisers, not to be fulfilling some additional objectives that are added to them by society.

These right-leaning assumptions produce beautiful theory. Does the beauty of the theory also produce right-leaning mathematically- minded economists?

And where are the mathematical theories of the left? Perhaps they were outcompeted by the superior theories of financial economics. However, if we look harder, we see that this cannot be the case. Financial economics is not empirically provable to any level of statistical rigour insisted upon by a hard science, so empiricism has not struck out the theories of the left. Other possibilities are that the left has no maths, or that its maths is not beautiful.

The left’s motivations around fairness, negotiated co-ordination and equality have not resulted in mathematical theory. Complex and nuanced starting assumptions do not lend themselves to elegant, abstract analysis. The left has even debated, and often rejected, the use of money as a medium of exchange, and has certainly rejected financial wealth as the sole measure of an individual’s or enterprise’s success. Without the unifying concept that money is the best and only measure of worth, mathematical analysis is thrown into paralysis. A heterogenous bundle of measures of progress could never be amenable to singular formulae, beautiful or not. The closest the left gets to maths is in the guise of Keynes, who explained the role of government spending in counteracting and shortening periods of slow growth in a free market.

Does loving maths make us more right wing?

Do we need to develop the maths of the left, or to abandon the beauty of financial economics to make our advice more balanced?

Nico Aspinall is chief investment officer at Connected Asset Management

Image credit | Getty

ACT Sep22_Full LR.jpg
This article appeared in our September 2022 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
Opinion
Also filed in
Opinion
Topics
Risk & ERM
Soft skills

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

New Fast-Growing Team - Actuarial Systems Development

London (Greater)
Excellent Salary Package
Reference
143762

Actuarial Pension Consultant – Scotland/Remote – Up to £90,000 plus bonus

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £90,000 + Bonus
Reference
143761

Part Qualified Pensions Actuary– Specialised Pensions Consultancy - Scotland/Remote - Up to £70,000

Edinburgh / Glasgow / Remote working
Up to £70,000 + Bonus
Reference
143760
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ