Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • April 2019
04

Letters: Too many risks

Open-access content Friday 5th April 2019 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Letter from Charles Cowling.

It is a truth, sadly not universally acknowledged, that a pension scheme in possession of risky assets cannot want to provide guaranteed benefits. I wish Hilary Salt success in her crusade to encourage CDC schemes (bit.ly/ActuaryHSalt) but her riling against DB pension scheme trustees reducing investment risk is misplaced. Her ire should be directed at the politicians who decided that DB benefits should be guaranteed. Trustee and regulatory desire for providing guaranteed benefits is perfectly natural given our legislative framework. 

Hilary says: "As a trustee, if you don't take risks, you guarantee it will never get better". But members of DB schemes rarely, if ever, see their benefits improved as a result of trustee investment in risky assets such as equities. The holding of risky assets in DB pension schemes typically benefits employers rather than members. Trustees may be able to rationalise that this is in members' interests, but it should come with a requirement for trustees to give a stark risk warning to members that their benefits are not guaranteed and are payable only so long as the employer continues in operation.

Charles Cowling

25 March 2019

This article appeared in our April 2019 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
04

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Deputy Head of Capital Modelling

London (Central)
£110000 - £130000 per annum
Reference
144789

Head of Analytics (Actuarial)

London (Central)
£130000 - £165000 per annum
Reference
144788

Pensions Actuarial Analyst - GMP Equalisation

London (Central)
£ dependent upon experience
Reference
143745
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ