Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • July 2018
07

Letters: what about tolerance?

Open-access content 10th July 2018

Your article How’s your risk appetite? (bit.ly/2MwlphA) rightly draws attention to the importance of defining clear, relevant and practical risk appetites before undertaking risk management.


Your article How's your risk appetite? (bit.ly/2MwlphA) rightly draws attention to the importance of defining clear, relevant and practical risk appetites before undertaking risk management.However, it is disappointing that the article does not mention the linked subject of risk tolerance. Whereas risk appetite is the degree of risk which the firm is willing to take, risk tolerance is the degree of risk which the firm is able to take without getting into serious difficulties if foreseeable adverse scenarios actually occur.

If the firm's overall risk appetite exceeds its risk tolerance, there is the possibility of high profits but also of enormous losses or even insolvency. If its risk appetite is less than its risk tolerance, the firm will be relatively stable in a wide range of circumstances, but may not be as profitable as a competitor that is willing to take somewhat higher risks. It is the board's responsibility to understand the difference between the two concepts before deciding on its overall risk appetite.


Chris Lewin

13 June 2018 

This article appeared in our July 2018 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
07
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Longevity Actuary – Reinsurance

London (Central)
£100,000
Reference
118949

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
118965

Capital Project Actuary

£500 - £850 per day
Reference
118964
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200