Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2017
10

Questioning standards

Open-access content 10th October 2017

I write to express a mixture of sorrow and anger at the dismal attempt by the IFoA’s chief executive to justify the new TAS 100. He writes in his monthly column (The Actuary, September 2017, bit.ly/Actuarytransition): “In raising the TAS requirements to a higher level of principle, it makes sense at the same time to broaden their scope.”


I write to express a mixture of sorrow and anger at the dismal attempt by the IFoA's chief executive to justify the new TAS 100. He writes in his monthly column (The Actuary, September 2017, bit.ly/Actuarytransition): "In raising the TAS requirements to a higher level of principle, it makes sense at the same time to broaden their scope."

Really? Quite apart from the fact that the first part of the sentence does absolutely nothing to justify the second part, this assertion violates three of the five principles of good regulation which the IFoA and the FRC claim to subscribe to. Specifically, regulators should (1) intervene only when necessary; (2) focus on the problem so as to minimise side effects; and (3) be able to justify decisions.

Each of these three principles was breached by the FRC when it decided to expand the scope of TASs without identifying any new problem to be addressed, without minimising the manner in which the (unidentified) problem was dealt with and without giving any reason for the proposal.

I have written about this before in these pages (March 2014, bit.ly/Regsstillgoodforus). The FRC ploughed on, making no attempt to remedy the deficiency in its reasoning. It is a shame to see the IFoA's CEO now trying to plug the gap in the FRC's thinking in such a forlorn manner. One has to wonder why he felt the need.

 

Simon Carne

8 September, 2017

This article appeared in our October 2017 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Director of Investment Risk

London (Central)
+ comprehensive benefits
Reference
118783

Qualified Reporting and Process Improvement

London (Central)
£90,000 - £100,000
Reference
118762

Risk Actuary

London (Central)
Market Rates + 20% bonus + benefits
Reference
118782
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200