Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2017
02

Meaningful measures of pension scheme strength

Open-access content Tuesday 7th February 2017 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Chris O’Brien says actuaries should seek more relevant ways to measure the financial strength of pension schemes

2


Regulations in the UK require trustees of a defined benefit pension scheme to disclose information to members about the financial position of the scheme. I would suggest that the regulations as they stand are quite unsatisfactory. I am sure actuaries, with their public interest role, can help to improve them. 

—

The regulations require trustees to disclose, in a summary funding statement (SFS) to members, the scheme's financial position on two measures. The first compares the market value of assets with liabilities assessed as the buy-out cost from an insurer. It is common for trustees to explain that the buy-out cost inflates the liabilities compared with the trustees fulfilling their obligations themselves, and that they have no intention of using a buy-out.

The relevance of the buy-out cost is therefore downplayed, and members are led to focus on the disclosure arising from the other measure in the regulations, where assets are compared with 'technical provisions'.


Variations on a theme

The main problem is that technical provisions are not well defined. Particularly serious is the choice available in determining the discount rate, which the regulations say can be based on either government (or other high-quality) bond yields or the expected investment return on the scheme assets. The choice of discount rate can lead to substantial variations in technical provisions, but with members being unaware of such discretion, this makes the disclosure almost meaningless.

In practice, trustees typically choose the discount rate as a prudent expected investment return. Such a valuation has an important role in helping the sponsor assess what contributions need to be made to the scheme. It takes advanced credit for expected future investment returns in excess of risk-free, matching market instruments, and this reduces the value placed on the liabilities, typically by up to 40%, compared with a risk-free discount rate. 

This approach was called a 'budgeting framework' in the sessional paper by Cowling et al (British Actuarial Journal, 2012) but the authors argued that it is inadequate for disclosing the financial strength to members. After all, the liabilities depend on matters such as inflation, years of service and mortality, and don't automatically reduce if the trustees and sponsoring employer choose a higher risk investment strategy. There are also unfunded schemes, which still have liabilities even without an expected investment return.

The alternative to a budgeting framework is a 'matching framework', where liabilities are valued with reference to market instruments with matching cashflows; and Cowling et al pressed for this to be the focus of disclosure to members. Now the buyout cost is a matching approach, but assumes trustees transfer their obligations to an insurer, whereas we wish to understand the position if trustees fulfil their obligations. That could lead to discounting at government bond yields, although we can justify using yields on risky assets minus the effect of risk; for example, Solvency II's approach of using swap rates with a small credit risk adjustment. It is also fair to adjust for the illiquidity of defined benefit liabilities. Some simplifications may be needed for practicability, and the outcome should be regulations prescribing the discount rate as the gilts or swaps yield together with some margin.


Press for change 

Trustees may still wish the SFS to include a funding ratio using the budgeting framework, perhaps in the context of explaining contribution levels. Such disclosure should not be compulsory and, if made, must avoid leading to confusion and should not undermine the relevance to members of the matching framework. 

The actuarial profession can play an important role in helping to shape relevant regulation, perhaps greater with post-Brexit freedoms. I suggest it should press for a change in the regulations regarding disclosures in the SFS, to require the use of a discount rate based on a matching framework in order to provide a more meaningful and consistent measure of a pension scheme's financial strength.


Chris O'Brien is a senior associate at the Centre for Risk, Banking and Financial Services, Nottingham University Business School


This article appeared in our February 2017 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Share and share alike

Damian Sivajoti reports on his experience of shared parental leave and how it can help propel gender diversity within the profession
Wednesday 8th February 2017
Open-access content
2

Flying the flag for insurance

Huw Evans, director-general of the Association of British Insurers, talks to Yves Colomb and Richard Purcell about Brexit, rebuilding public trust and going digital
Tuesday 7th February 2017
Open-access content
2

Climate risk: rain or shine

Mark Thompson explains how to provide protection against climate risks, and champions more environmentally sound corporate governance
Tuesday 7th February 2017
Open-access content
2

The inequality challenge

Tackling the GMP inequality issue through conversion seems the least problematic of a number of other options, but doing the calculations has its own difficulties, explain David Everett and Donna Matteucci
Tuesday 7th February 2017
Open-access content
2

Naut' but happiness

The Argonauts Dining Club is for actuaries working outside traditional fields. It was established in 1955 and has over 60 diners.
Tuesday 7th February 2017
Open-access content
2

Colour me actuary

The ‘Colour Me Actuary’ social event gave everyone in attendance a whirlwind insight into an alternative career of fashion.
Tuesday 7th February 2017
Open-access content

Latest from February 2017

2

Global banks at risk from 'rising tide' of regulation after being fined $321bn since financial crisis

Banks worldwide must create more efficient and effective processes if they hope to survive increasing regulatory requirements, according to a report by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Friday 3rd March 2017
Open-access content
2

Optimism rising for London's economy but infrastructure improvement is vital

London firms feel more positive about the economy than just after the EU referendum, but believe improving the capital’s infrastructure is key, according to the Confederation of British Industry (CBI).
Wednesday 1st March 2017
Open-access content
2

Financial Services Industry most concerned about digital disruption

It has been found that 78% of financial services firms are worried about the impact digital disruption could have on their organisation, making it the most concerned industry in the UK.
Wednesday 1st March 2017
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 02

2

Engaged tone

Derek Cribb takes stock of the profession’s successes in 2016 and outlines the plans for the year ahead
Monday 6th February 2017
Open-access content
2

Expert witnesses

In line with his presidential theme of ‘thought leadership’, Colin Wilson describes the rise of the IFoA’s public profile
Monday 6th February 2017
Open-access content

Paper thin

I would like to comment on actuarial research papers on policyholder reasonable expectation (PRE). Actuaries have been taking an unduly narrow understanding of the issues of fairness
Monday 6th February 2017
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Actuarial Manager - Non-Life Reserving

London (Central)
£ excellent package
Reference
148614

Senior Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London, England
£130000 - £155000 per annum
Reference
148611

Capital Analytics Manager

London, England
£80000 - £120000 per annum
Reference
148610
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ