Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2016
11

Are pension funds missing the hot ticket? 

Open-access content Wednesday 26th October 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Natalie Smith and Alice Garton discuss the need for pension scheme trustees to take heed of climate risk to ensure they are fulfilling their legal duties

2
Alice Garton


Despite the growing global consensus, climate-related financial risks (known commonly as 'climate risk') are still not being adequately considered by those directly responsible for the pensions of millions of savers: trustees and investment managers of pension schemes. This could in turn be exposing trustees to the risk of legal challenge.

Climate risk is partially about extreme weather events and rising sea levels threatening the economic value of assets like property, infrastructure and agriculture, among other 'physical risks'. It is also presented by regulatory requirements to curb greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in the stranding of carbon-intensive and carbon-exposed assets, and increased competition from renewables and low-carbon technologies ('transition risk'). While climate risk is often regarded as an environmental, social and governance (ESG) factor, we are focusing specifically on the financial risks that stem from climate change. 

Recent findings, and our wider work in this area, reveal that there is still an unacceptable level of scepticism on trustee boards that climate change poses financially material risks to pension scheme investments. 

In a survey recently conducted in the UK by Professional Pensions, 53% of respondents said they did not think climate change poses financially material risks to their or their clients' portfolios. However, according to Howard Covington et al., initial estimates point to a "value at risk" of 10% of equity market value (that is, the measure of systemic climate risk to the world's equity markets). Covington is one of several experts addressing the systemic nature of climate risk. 

The survey response is therefore surprising. These are individuals tasked with acting "in the best (financial) interests of members", and those who support and advise them. In our work, we have found that similar views are shared by those in the pensions industry of other jurisdictions.

A recent report by ClientEarth and ShareAction, The Hot Debate on Climate Risk and Pension Investments, seeks to provide some insight into the misconceptions around climate risk and why they remain so pervasive. Responses ranged from outright dismissal to more nuanced answers. For example, commentators noted the lack of understanding regarding the investment risks posed by climate change, the lack of diversity (especially demographic and gender) on trustee boards (leading to 'group-think'), and short-termism (among others) as factors precluding consideration of climate risk. 

With respect to short-termism, the law requires trustees to balance imminent obligations to current pensioners with the long-term needs of future beneficiaries - one should not come at the cost of the other.

Some 16% of respondents to the survey said that "ambiguity" in the law also prevented climate risk from featuring in investment decisions. The lawyers among the respondents, however, maintained that the problem lies not with the law but with trustees' understanding of it - our opinion too. The legal position is simple. If trustees acknowledge that their pension schemes are exposed to climate risk, they are legally obliged to consider such risk during the investment decision-making process. In these circumstances, funds must measure/seek to quantify the risk, then adequately manage it on behalf of members. Trustees who fail to even turn their minds to climate risk could be exposing themselves to legal challenge for breach of their legal and fiduciary duties.

The position may be simple but, as noted above, the law continues to be misunderstood and/or misapplied in many cases. This is primarily owing to misapprehension on trustee boards about climate risk and what it means for investment portfolios. For trustees, this is a precarious position, since it is they who are ultimately accountable to their members. It is vital, therefore, that they fully understand their legal obligations - and the implications for them if they fail to do so. It is professional advisers like investment consultants and investment managers who will play a critical role in shifting and improving the status quo.

Actuaries have begun the extremely important work of highlighting climate-related financial risks to insurers, pension funds and other financial institutions. We would urge the profession to keep bringing these risks to the attention of trustees. By raising the requisite level of knowledge and understanding of climate risk across the industry, actuaries increase the legal and financial security of their trustee clients. This in turn helps to ensure that members' lifesavings are adequately protected in the long-term.


Natalie smith is a lawyer at ClientEarth

Alice Garton leads ClientEarth's company and financial work 


This article appeared in our November 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
11

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Actuarial Manager

London (Central)
£100,000 - £130,000 basic + bonus and benefits
Reference
145832

Pricing Analyst

London, England
£30000 - £45000 per annum
Reference
145831

Capital Modelling Analyst

London, England
£35000 - £55000 per annum
Reference
145830
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ