Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • July 2016
07

Letter: Allowing for compensation risk

Open-access content 4th July 2016

I write to comment on Anthony Pepper’s letter in the June edition (bit.ly/28TE2sE).


I write to comment on Anthony Pepper's letter in the June edition (bit.ly/28TE2sE). I believe he has misunderstood Peter Morris's comment, which was, I think, referring to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme as a mitigant for life office insolvency risk as far as a policyholder is concerned. Peter rightly points out that product risk is not compensated like insolvency risk.

This is not to take away from Anthony's general point about compensation risk, and I concur that insurers need to take the issue seriously. While the risk is higher for those such as intermediaries giving advice, there is nonetheless a risk to life office solvency in the more extreme cases, or where the office offers advice. The damages that could result are not - in my view and without being legally qualified - "insurance obligations" to which the rules for technical provisions apply, and therefore fall under accounting principles, subject always to Article 75. My feeling is there is therefore unlikely to be any balance sheet provision required on such a general basis. 

I do, however, think an internal model should result in appropriate capital for this risk.

I do not see that the cases cited by Anthony go as far as covering mere ill-performance, though misrepresentation or non-compliance with the Conduct of Business Sourcebook would seem to be analogous to the facts of the Saville v CCL case - again to my non-lawyer's eyes. The case seemed to hang on the unsuitability of the contract for the policyholders and a failure to comply with the Insurance Conduct of Business Sourcebook though, and not to some intrinsic toxicity. Plevin v Paragon does not have general application to insurance, as it relied upon section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act.

Andrew Chamberlain

8 June 2016


This article appeared in our July 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
07
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Make the switch from Pensions > Life Insurance

Manchester
Excellent Salary + Bonus (study support if required)
Reference
118732

Nearly/Newly Qualified Actuary – With Profits Reporting & Valuation

Scotland
£Upon Application
Reference
118763

Director of Investment Risk

London (Central)
+ comprehensive benefits
Reference
118783
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200