Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2016
06

Managing management risk

Open-access content Wednesday 25th May 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Paul Harwood suggests management risk should be considered as a category on its own, to the benefit of business results

2

I may have discovered a new risk: 'management risk' - defined as 'the risk that management doesn't deliver the planned results'. This type of risk is strangely absent from much of the enterprise risk management (ERM) literature.

Isn't it just operational risk? It could be, particularly given that operational risk is a balancing category, a convenient label for a diverse set of 'no upside' risks. But I've never seen management risk as an operational risk sub-category. Plus, it has an upside.

What's the nature of management risk? Boards hire management teams to deliver a defined plan on agreed assumptions within a reasonable corridor. The great thing about a plan is that you can subject it to a whole host of tests, stresses and scenarios. You can assess how results benefit from better - or suffer from poorer - management, and whether assumptions are reasonable. This feels like productive, meaningful analysis.

Luck or judgment?
Yet business results happen by luck as well as skill. Colleagues tell me that when results are good, management takes the credit; when they are poor, it's down to bad luck. That can't be the whole truth of it, regardless of the cynics. Certainly, performance is a mixture of luck and skill. A good result might have been better with more luck, a bad result might have been worse with less management skill.

Do boards hire management teams for their luck or skill? It should be skill - assuming that luck is not a part of a team's composition. Shouldn't we be pressing to understand how much of management's performance comes from skill and how much from luck? This, I suggest, is about understanding the nature of management risk.

Ideally, remuneration and skill would be correlated. Maybe that's not consistently the case in practice. I'm not offended by that; it is the way of the world. What does concern me is a default approach to risk management that does everything but put management under the spotlight. The closest we get is to talk of culture. These discussions can be interesting, but they tend to explain, rather than help manage, problems.

We must take care in financial services. Decision-makers, often not close enough to the models, rely on the analysis and synthesis of actuaries and risk officers. Sometimes the synthesis is wanting, and voluminous analysis serves as a proxy. Management can mistake the volume of their choices and the breadth of their discussions as symptomatic of good culture and an open environment.

The reality is that risk management crystallises when decisions are made, and culture radiates most strongly from decisions made (what is rewarded, what is punished), not the tolerant, friendly, anything-can-be-raised atmosphere in the boardroom.

What better risk management strategy than to expect management to deliver what it promises? That sends a very strong anchoring message for the culture: "We mean what we say."

Assessing management risk brings executive performance management and risk management together. This can only be a good thing.

Operational risk is no longer a little-understood silo report but central to the evaluation of executive ability.

Does this introduce incentives to game the system? Yes, theoretically.

But boards already have to ensure that their management information systems needs are met and that board challenge is robust, regardless of any gaming that is going on. There is no reason why management risk can't be part of that.

A common plan
'Management' follows from the accumulated decisions of, maybe, hundreds of people. So it could be argued that focusing on management risk overly concentrates challenge on the few people around the table.

But all ERM work starts with those very same people. They need a common language, drivers and intent to support their decision-making.

The plan conveys that.

Furthermore, the overarching plan is made up of many smaller plans that should, diversification aside, add up. Management risk should be additive. Focusing on the same things throughout can't be deleterious.

In summary, management risk may be the missing link, the driver of culture, and a risk component that boards can use to manage their firms to good effect. Let's have more managers doing what they said they would, or explaining why, in the context of risks faced and skills executed. The result should be a proper appreciation of high-quality management teams that can drive and protect business results.


Paul Harwood is a consulting actuary specialising in strategy and risk management
This article appeared in our June 2016 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Regulation and beyond

Richard Purcell underlines the importance of professional standards, and how they create challenges and opportunities for actuaries
Monday 23rd May 2016
Open-access content
2

Out with the old, in with the new

Keith Goodby and Mary Boyle ask whether insurers can profit from illiquidity premiums after the implementation of Solvency II
Wednesday 25th May 2016
Open-access content
2

Climate change: potential liabilities for business, directors, trustees and insurers

This was the event that drew in an audience of over 90 delegates on 13 April at Staple Inn Hall, London. Chaired by Michael Tripp and organised by the Resource and Environment Board, the event saw pension consultants, trustees, investment managers, insurers, regulators and environmental non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in attendance.
Wednesday 25th May 2016
Open-access content
2

Spiegelhalter on communicating risk and uncertainty

On 4 May, the IFoA held its Spring Lecture in London, delivered by Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter OBE FRS (pictured right), an expert on probability and statistics. Spiegelhalter is a distinguished British statistician and Winton Professor of the Public Understanding of Risk in the Statistical Laboratory at the University of Cambridge. He was also recently elected as an IFoA Honorary Fellow and was presented with his award at the start of the lecture from IFoA president Fiona Morrison.
Wednesday 25th May 2016
Open-access content
2

The new arms race against bacteria

Matthew Edwards and Nicola Oliver review the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, their plausible effects on mortality and recent progress in the development of new drugs
Wednesday 25th May 2016
Open-access content
2

Herd Instinct and regulation as a risk

Sam Mageed and David Prowse explore how Solvency II requirements to protect policyholders could create new risks
Tuesday 24th May 2016
Open-access content

Latest from June 2016

A pair of hands of an old man working © iStock

Pensioners' incomes almost the same as workers'

The gap between the incomes of pensioners and people of working age has narrowed over 20 years, according to official figures.
Thursday 30th June 2016
Open-access content
A broken piggy bank © iStock

Secondary annuity market should be put on hold, say advisers

Plans to extend pension freedoms to existing annuity holders should be suspended because of Brexit, according to the Association of Professional Financial Advisers (APFA).
Thursday 30th June 2016
Open-access content
London eye

Insurers need proactive risk management to deal with Brexit

In order to understand the impact of the UK leaving the EU, insurance companies need to have much more proactive risk management, according to a consultancy.
Wednesday 29th June 2016
Open-access content

Latest from missing_authorDate_strap_details

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
OCT-2019.jpg

10

October 2019 archive + digital edition
Wednesday 9th October 2019
Open-access content

Latest from small_opening_image

2

COVID-19 forum for actuaries launched

A forum for actuaries has been launched to help the profession come together and learn how best to respond to the deadly coronavirus sweeping the world.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Travel insurers expect record payouts this year

UK travel insurers expect to pay a record £275m to customers this year as coronavirus grounds flights across the world, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) has revealed.
Wednesday 25th March 2020
Open-access content
2

Grim economic forecasts made as countries lockdown

A sharp recession is imminent in the vast majority of developed and emerging economies as the deadly coronavirus forces businesses to shut down across the world.
Tuesday 24th March 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 06

2

What has changed in our environment?

With the IFoA’s strategy review imminent, Derek Cribb provides some background on the current actuarial landscape
Friday 27th May 2016
Open-access content
2

Shining the spotlight on promotion

In her final commentary, Fiona Morrison remains passionate in continuing to promote the value of the actuarial skillset
Friday 27th May 2016
Open-access content

Letter: Reserving for complaints

The pensions model that has served the actuarial profession for so many prosperous years is broken.
Monday 23rd May 2016
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pricing Trading Manager - Contract

£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
148579

Head of Financial Risk

Flexible / hybrid working with minimum 2 days p/w office-based
£ excellent package
Reference
148578

Insurance Risk Leader

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ to attract the best
Reference
148577
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ