Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2016
05

Rationale for Solvency II

Open-access content Tuesday 3rd May 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Cathal Rabbitte’s letter (The Actuary, March) was interesting reading for someone who describes Solvency II as yesterday’s solution to the previous day’s problem.


Cathal Rabbitte's letter (The Actuary, March) was interesting reading for someone who describes Solvency II as yesterday's solution to the previous day's problem.

For decades, much of the UK life assurance industry has pursued a business model around products that transfer risk to policyholders. Consequently, most of the industry's investment risks threaten possible legitimised policyholder detriment but without direct first-order solvency implications. This, unlike detriment from insolvency, is not mitigated by compensation schemes.

In the UK now, life company insolvency is no longer the major potential cause of poor policyholder outcomes. 

The risk transfer business model has arguably removed much of the rationale for Solvency II.

This inevitably calls into question whether resources devoted to Solvency II were really proportionate to the scale of its relevance within the bigger picture.

Perhaps complex mathematical models of factors affecting solvency are more exciting than considering how to contain the worst aspects of potential policyholder detriment inherent in the risk transfer business model. But the latter challenge, however seemingly mundane, might be more significant in the overall scheme of things.

Ironically for a designated consumer protection measure, some who worked on Solvency II maintained that less diligence was needed for risks to policyholders than for those falling on the firm. This concept exists at least once in the final product.

Lastly, a possibly naïve question on market-consistent valuations. How to operate the £1 trillion-ish existing UK unit-linked business, including tracker funds, with a different asset valuation methodology?


Peter Morris 

15 March 2016

This article appeared in our May 2016 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

High expectations

My daughter recently entered a Royal Mail competition in which she was asked to apply for her dream job.
Tuesday 3rd May 2016
Open-access content

Soft skills scuppered

Derek Cribb makes some very interesting observations in his article: Through The Actuarial Looking Glass
Tuesday 3rd May 2016
Open-access content
A BHS store in the UK © Shuttertstock

Philip Green agrees to answer MPs' questions over BHS collapse

Former BHS owner Philip Green has accepted the invitation from the Work and Pensions Select Committee to give evidence in an inquiry into to the collapse of the chain.
Wednesday 4th May 2016
Open-access content
japan

Japan suffers low insurance protection despite frequent earthquakes

The earthquake insurance penetration level remains “fairly low” in Japan despite its frequency for such disasters, according to Impact Forecasting, Aon Benfield’s catastrophe model development team.
Monday 9th May 2016
Open-access content
A man using a laptop with virus © Shutterstock

Two thirds of UK businesses suffer cyber breach

The UK government is urging businesses to protect themselves after a survey revealed 65% of large companies detected a cyber attack in the past year.
Tuesday 10th May 2016
Open-access content
ta filler

Philip Green slams TPR's comments on BHS pensions

Former BHS boss Philip Green has criticised the Pensions Regulator (TPR) for providing incorrect information to MPs during an oral evidence session over the collapse of the high street chain.
Thursday 12th May 2016
Open-access content
Filed in
05
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Reserving Analyst

London (City of)
Negotiable
Reference
149485

Senior GI Modeler - Capital and Planning

London (Central)
£ excellent
Reference
149436

Risk Oversight Manager

Flexible / hybrid with a minimum of 2 days per week office-based
£ excellent
Reference
149435
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ