Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2015
06
Opinion

Disclosure - don't alarm older members

Open-access content Monday 1st June 2015 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Under the heading of ‘public interest’, what do pension scheme actuaries think of the statutory funding disclosure requirements for defined benefit (DB) schemes? We think they could do better

2

Under the heading of 'public interest', what do pension scheme actuaries think of the statutory funding disclosure requirements for defined benefit (DB) schemes? We think they could do better.

In the annual Summary Funding Statement, members firstly have to be told about the ongoing funding position and any recovery plan in place. It is right for the disclosure to highlight the employer's commitment to contribute so that the scheme can meet its obligations. But we also need to say what happens if the scheme is actually wound up. 

Disclosure should answer the question uppermost in a member's mind: "What will happen to me, personally. To my benefits?". Remember the conclusion of the sessional paper of Cowling et al (2011): for disclosing funding information to members, we should focus on the (current and expected future) solvency position, which should use a "matching framework". For example, this may involve a discount rate based on gilts or swaps or could use the wind-up basis as being similar to matching. 

The statutory wind-up/solvency disclosure normally takes the form: "In the event of the scheme having to be wound up, as at the valuation date it is estimated that the assets would provide X% of the benefits accrued to date" - the range of coverage is typically between 50% and 80%. Any member, particularly a current pensioner, reading such a statement is entitled to be worried: "What? I could lose 20%-50% of my pension?"


Sharing information

But this statutory disclosure pre-dates a number of major developments: principally, the Pensions Act 1995 now overrides scheme-specific wind-up rules, and the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) usually underpins DB benefits. So, we appeal to scheme actuaries to give their trustee or sponsor clients some more useful information to pass on to members. It is the actuary after all who writes the annual funding statements.

How this should best be done depends on whether or not the scheme is fully funded on a PPF basis. If it is not, then the disclosure statements can be accompanied by a reminder to members of their entitlements under the PPF - not individual calculations, just a summary to the effect that: "Pensions in payment (if you're over age 65) would not be reduced, while for all members below that age (pensioners, deferreds and actives) benefits would be reduced to 90% and there would be a maximum pension of about £26,000; revaluation would still apply up to state pension age and only the pension earned after April 1997 would be increased; your spouse would receive 50% of your pension on death." (Yes, we know that's a simple version - you can work out your own wording).

But if a scheme is funded above the PPF level - which should become increasingly true for the majority of schemes now closed to new members and future accrual and with journey plans in place - then extra information can be added, along the lines of: "You will receive the Pension Protection Fund benefits already described as a minimum and the trustees would be able to secure increases of about y% on pre-1997 benefits".

Here the actuary would have to do a few more sums, but only on a scheme-wide basis, we're not advocating disclosing individual member amounts.

The important thing about adding some sentences about the PPF, and funding above that level, is that it reminds members, particularly older pensioners, not to panic. The bald statement about 60%ish "solvency" is really quite frightening.

Ideally we would like to see changes to the statutory disclosure rules but, failing that, we urge scheme actuaries to consider how they can communicate scheme financing using a matching framework and set out the wind-up position in a way that takes account of the PPF. So, what's not to like?


Chris O'Brien is a senior associate at Nottingham University Business School's Centre of Risk, Banking and Financial Services. 

Bob Chadwick is mostly retired after a career in insurance and consulting but is now a trustee of two pension schemes.

This article appeared in our June 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
06
Also filed in
Opinion

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Risk Actuary - General Insurance

London (Greater)
£60,000 - £85,000
Reference
145934

Project Actuary - Life Insurance

Midlands
£60,000 - £110,000
Reference
145933

Model Validation Actuary

London (Greater)
£60k - £80k
Reference
145932
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ