Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • April 2015
04

The haves and have-nots

Open-access content Tuesday 31st March 2015 — updated 4.50pm, Tuesday 14th April 2020
2

There are two major issues that Darryl Boulton misses completely in his article Bankers and Bonuses (The Actuary, March). First, it is wrong, but a sad part of our culture, that various, but quite small groups, of our society get ridiculously large remuneration (which they then show off). At the same time there are so many others, indeed the majority, who are doing equally valuable jobs but paid low wages. 

By valuable, I speak of their contribution to society. Boulton ignores this very critical point.

Second, he claims that most jobs are suited to quantitative assessment. That may be the case with many jobs in the City of London, but it is certainly often not the case outside. I have spent a lot of time at hospices where staff and nurses seek to give dying patients as comfortable a death as possible. They gain satisfaction from seeing the reactions from patients and carers. But it is not possible to measure a good death objectively. There are lots of other jobs to which, in my view, this applies - probably the majority of jobs.

Boulton also talked about his team of 12 graduates and said everyone was a winner. Clearly, that was not the case because they had quite different productivity and got different pay. Maybe with better and more empathetic management, there might have been more equality, more satisfaction and better productivity.

My overall concern on this subject relates to the size of this remuneration inequality, which is driving increasing divisions in our society and leading to unsettlement and strife between those who have and those who don't.

Hugh Scurfield  7 March

This article appeared in our April 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
04

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ