Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2015
02

An author's critique

Open-access content Tuesday 3rd February 2015 — updated 4.50pm, Tuesday 14th April 2020
2
The Improbability Principle

 

I am always amused when book reviewers criticise a book on the grounds that it is not the book they would have written themselves. Matthew Edwards has invented a new variant of this, describing my book, The Improbability Principle, as belonging to the genre of 'smarter thinking' books, and then criticising it on the grounds that it does not really do this (The Actuary, December 2014). In fact, I regard the book as belonging to the 'popular science' genre - which is why Scientific American chose to reprint several pages of the book and why New Scientist chose it as one of their 10 '2014 crop for lovers of good books and fine ideas'.

Edwards remarks that my explanations 'are, understandably, aimed at those with little mathematical knowledge. Most readers of The Actuary will find this assumed starting point irritatingly low'. Why should readers be irritated by this assumed starting point if they regard the book as not aimed at them? You might as well say that most readers of The Actuary would find the Paddington Bear books irritatingly simplistic.

Still, putting Edwards' two perspectives of smarter thinking and irritatingly low together, readers of The Actuary might be interested in a New Scientist review of the book, which described it as "a superlative introduction to critical thinking, accessible to everybody, regardless of mathematical ability".

Incidentally, Edwards' description of the law of inevitability is incomplete - it only applies if all of the lottery tickets have been sold.

Professor David Hand

22 December

This article appeared in our February 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
02

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Risk Actuary - General Insurance

London (Greater)
£60,000 - £85,000
Reference
145934

Project Actuary - Life Insurance

Midlands
£60,000 - £110,000
Reference
145933

Model Validation Actuary

London (Greater)
£60k - £80k
Reference
145932
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ