Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2013
12

Soapbox: Mandatory security is not good security

Open-access content Friday 29th November 2013

Carl Leeman argues that EU mandatory financial security proposals are not taking into account the market capacity already available

2

Mandatory financial security has become a big trend at EU level, thanks to recent catastrophic events, such as the 2011 Fukushima reactor disaster in Japan. But as business insurance buyers, we believe this is not the way to allow the market to create the most efficient solutions for the industry.  

Three separate Directorates General (DG) of the European Commission - Environment, Energy and Internal Market & Services - have come up with mandatory financial security proposals this year. The Commission wants to convince member states that such pan-European schemes are necessary to cover the adverse consequences of industrial activities. It's also looking at ways of funding the impact of natural and man-made disasters, likely to be highlighted by the devastation caused by Typhoon Haiyan in November.

Starting in 2012, DG Environment commissioned a series of reports on the enforcement of the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) in the 27 member states, which were published in June 2013. The ELD established a new kind of liability regime for biodiversity damages for certain industrial operators; this current review was the opportunity for the Commission to start thinking more about the ability of companies to pay for the recovery. Its idea is that operators should be able to demonstrate they have the financial capacity to pay the costs of environmental remediation, by insurance, letter of credit, internal provision or some other means. 


Risk and insurance

Except for the largest companies with deep resources, insurance is likely to be the most cost-effective means of covering these exposures, and since the ELD came into effect in 2004, the insurance industry has been developing products to meet the needs of operators. The Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA) sees no need for what is in effect a compulsory scheme for financial security for environmental impairment, and there have been no cases to date where it would have been necessary. 

The Commission is not taking account of what market capacity is already available. A compulsory scheme could not be flexible enough to respond to the diverse nature of operators and risks under the ELD, and it would reduce the ability of the insurance industry to build a viable pool of business. 

When the insurance market is working well, there is no specific reason to move to a mandatory financial security scheme. A free insurance market is likely to respond better to the needs of insurance buyers at a fair price, and there is established law on many of the coverage issues that could arise. 

The Commission will release its final report on ELD financial security in April 2014, with a list of options to be discussed by the new Commission following the European elections in May. The only exception among the current crop of proposals is the nuclear sector, for which the energy commissioner confirmed there would be a proposal before the end of the year for a mandatory insurance scheme for nuclear operators, and that it will be high on the agenda of the new parliament. 

It is up to industry to convince the Commission that imposing mandatory financial security schemes for environmental damage on European operators would be counter-productive. For one, it would lead to unintended and potentially damaging consequences, as it would be a long and risky task to reach a consensus over such measures among member states with very uncertain results. 

The environmental insurance market should be allowed to continue to develop without constraints from a rigid and 'one-size-fits-all' kind of regime. ELD-related risks are too diverse and their exposure is over a long time. These cannot be covered by one single mandatory insurance scheme.

Let's also remind ourselves that the Commission is now also active on the cyber security front, with a specific strategy and a proposed Directive on Network and Information Security targeting 'critical operators' and their infrastructure. No doubt financial security will also come up at some point.


Carl Leeman is a board member of FERMA and president of the International Federation of Risk and Insurance Management Associations (IFRIMA). He is chief risk officer of global logistics services provider Katoen Natie, based in Antwerp

This article appeared in our December 2013 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

President's comment: Reflections on making a difference

David Hare underlines that to succeed at a higher level actuaries will need broader skill sets than their forebears
Friday 29th November 2013
Open-access content
2

Derek Cribb: The year in review

Derek Cribb takes a look at what the IFoA has achieved in 2013 and what the future holds
Thursday 28th November 2013
Open-access content
Deepak Jobanputra Pru Protect editor The Actuary

Ring in the new

Actuaries should develop a balanced approach to create a good legacy, says Deepak Jobanputra
Tuesday 26th November 2013
Open-access content
2

All in the risk mix

Modern risk strategy is hard, primarily because modern business is complex. Neil Cantle looks at the ‘Own Risk and Solvency Assessment’ that firms will be facing
Friday 29th November 2013
Open-access content
2

Blights and boons of financial repression

Can government interference in the financial markets aid or damage a country? Paul Fulcher and the financial repression working party share their insights
Friday 29th November 2013
Open-access content

IFoA: News in Brief

Paul Reynolds, director of public affairs, outlines a very busy year for his team
Friday 29th November 2013
Open-access content

Latest from Modelling/software

EG\

Uneven outcomes: findings on cancer mortality

Ayşe Arık, Andrew Cairns, Erengul Dodd, Adam Shao and George Streftaris share their findings on the impact of socio-economic differences and diagnostic delays on cancer mortality
Wednesday 1st June 2022
Open-access content
dtj

Talking census: making use of data

With the ONS starting to release the data from the 2021 census, Jeremy Keating considers how those working in insurance can make use of it
Wednesday 1st June 2022
Open-access content
hrts

Storm watch: Can IPCC models be used in cat modelling?

Can IPCC projections be used to adjust catastrophe models for climate change? Nigel Winspear and David Maneval investigate, using US hurricanes as an example
Wednesday 1st June 2022
Open-access content

Latest from December 2013

ta

Trustees urged to complete TPR toolkit

Pension scheme trustees have been urged to bring themselves up to speed with key retirement policies and legal developments by completing new modules in The Pension Regulator's trustee toolkit.
Thursday 31st July 2014
Open-access content

Driverless cars 'require new insurance approach'

There needs to be a fresh approach to motor insurance if driverless cars are to become a feature of the UK road landscape, a senior industry leader has claimed.
Wednesday 30th July 2014
Open-access content

Annuity sales 'down 44% over the year'

There was a 44% drop in annuity sales in June when compared to the same month last year, according to research by financial systems provider IRESS.
Wednesday 30th July 2014
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Leading Insurer/Asset Manager – Pricing Actuary (Mortgages)

London (Greater)
Competitive
Reference
148750

Senior Consultant - Risk Settlement - Any UK Location - Up to £100,000 plus bonus

London / Manchester / Edinburgh / Remote
Up to £100,000 + Bonus
Reference
148832

Finance Transformation Actuarial student/Qualified Actuary

London (Central)
£50,000 - £75,000 depending on experience
Reference
148830
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ