Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2012
12

Letters to the editor - December 2012

Open-access content Thursday 29th November 2012

Actuaries taking familiar paths through wider fields

2

Railing against complacency

I'm an actuary who rather lost faith in the profession the more I discovered how much we didn't know about risk and the more I realised how far we'd let other professionals secure the centre ground.

The assessment of bids for the West Coast Main Line rail franchise is a good example from this centre ground.

Information on what went wrong is sparse, but there seems to be a problem with risk assessment allowing for inflation.

 Nobody, as far as I am aware, considered actuaries to be the natural group to review the bids before they went out, or - more high profile- to report on the problems after the event.

But, at a time when the profession is trying hard to raise its game in all aspects of risk, I'm pretty sure any actuary worth their salt would have avoided the errors that seem to have been perpetrated,

The problem is that we still lack status and acceptance as risk professionals and we aren't, as we aspire to be, the natural choice to carry out such reviews.

We must continue to challenge ourselves by asking how far we have travelled down the road to acceptance, where the end of the road is defined as a position where Richard Branson or First Group or the government calls us in as a matter of routine.

Richard Chapman 29 October

No saving grace for our Ageing Society

I attended the Actuarial Profession's and the International Longevity Centre-UK's joint debate, 'The Cost of our Ageing Society', on 16 October and am sorry to say that I was disappointed with almost all the contributions, although I was unable to stay to hear the final speaker, Colin Redman.

In particular, I find the idea of concentrating on support and dependency ratios, which was common to all the speakers I heard, to be a totally flawed approach. It assumes that all people not working need 'supporting', irrespective of the amount of their capital, whether inherited or saved. It is an insult to ignore the significant savings of many people during their lifetime (via career success) and to assign them as 'people who need support'.

Did the speakers forget about savings entirely? If so, it was either naïvety on their part or an admission that actuaries, of all people, don't understand the benefits of saving - ie, that the process helps not only the savers but also everybody else via the resulting new capital and hence greater output.

The widespread use of an assumption of support or dependency based only on age is poor and will lead to wrong decisions. Actuaries should be leaders in this field, yet they seem to be either as wrong-headed as all the other vested interests at large, or simply staying out of the debate. Either way, is this really what actuaries want?

Terry Arthur 27 October

Step up to the mark or step aside

I enjoyed reading your Editorial article in the November issue of The Actuary (p5). Actuaries need to demonstrate their expertise in wider fields, and I heartily endorse moves into new areas.

You mention investment as a traditional field for actuaries; numerical analyses, models, stochastic processes and risk analyses are well established. However, many actuaries who were formerly involved in investment management or education fear that the decision-making aspect in this field has been overtaken by erudite mathematics, the actuary's natural comfort zone.

In September, I received a stimulating article from Richard Fitzherbert, a retired investment actuary and honorary fellow at the University of Melbourne, entitled 'The Death of Genuine Investment Education Within the Actuarial Profession'. This bears out the feelings of all actuaries involved in practical investment activities.

The whole subject deserves to be debated through The Actuary magazine or elsewhere, unless actuaries wish to remain as superior number crunchers, leaving all management decisions to accountants, lawyers, bankers, politicians and economists.

Kent Sandom 10 November

This article appeared in our December 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
12

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Catastrophe Modelling Analyst - London Market Broker

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
145925

Senior Catastrophe Analyst

England, London
£65000 - £75000 per annum
Reference
145924

Life Actuary - Financial Reporting - Day Rate contract

Negotiable
Reference
145923
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ