Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2012
11

Soapbox: Information overload

Open-access content Thursday 1st November 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

When it comes to communication, the best policy, says Richard Butcher, is to keep it simple and concise

2

Back in 2006, the Dutch town of Makkinga tried a radical road experiment, taking away all road signs. It took the curb stones out so that cars and pedestrians shared the same space and it took out all road markings. It even removed parking restrictions and meters.

In theory, there should have been chaos, with drivers and pedestrians unsure of where they should be and drivers poorly informed of hazards and obstacles. They wouldn't even be told how fast to drive.

In fact, it wasn't chaos at all - there was a dramatic reduction in the number of accidents and casualty numbers plummeted.This was the result of two factors. First, because they were unsure how to precede, everyone - drivers and pedestrians - was more careful. Second, undistracted by the clutter of signs and information, drivers paid more attention to the road and what was going on around it.

It was a brave step by the authorities, but it paid dividends: a clear example of less communication producing a better result.

Driving is, of course, a complex process, but we nearly all get to grips with it in the end. It is, we could say, a familiar process, so achieving a good outcome, even with a complete lack of communication, should be achievable.

Pension saving, investment and annuitisation aren't familiar processes to most people, so it would be unreasonable to expect a good outcome without some form of communication. That said, the basic lesson of Makkinga still rings true: if we avoid the message becoming too complex and crowded we should achieve better outcomes.

In the past few years, the Pensions Regulator has started creating a regulatory environment for the generation of defined contribution (DC) schemes that will survive beyond auto-enrolment. Informed by the Department for Work and Pensions, the Investment Governance Group, the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), the Association of British Insurers (ABI) and others, it has floated six 'principles', six 'good outcomes' and 36 'key features'.

Three of the six 'good outcomes' identified for both contract and trust-based DC pension schemes require members to make 'appropriate' decisions in relation to their contributions, investments and decumulation options. They also require that communications are designed to ensure informed decisions are made.

To risk stating the obvious, members cannot make informed decisions without being informed. There is a need for communication.

Something like this has happened before. In the mid-1980s, a Financial Services Act introduced a framework of regulation governing the marketing and selling of financial products.

A core part of 'compliant' selling was that when a member of the public bought a financial product, they did so from a position of knowledge: they were informed about it. The outcome of that requirement was ridiculous. Personal pension quotes ran close to 100 pages of densely packed type, showing projections on various basis, with health warnings, key features, possible outcomes and more.

This over-communication, like the jungle of road signs that existed in Makkinga, was counterproductive: it distracted, confused, and made a good outcome less likely.

Today we are at another watershed in the pensions world. The regulatory community has a real chance to influence millions of people's lives for the better. If they are to succeed, however, they must avoid at all costs the mistakes of the past - the trap of requiring the pension community to disclose endless tons of wasted, useless verbiage in the vain hope and mistaken belief that in so doing they will improve outcomes. They will not.

The most effective test of whether a decision has been 'appropriate' is to look at the results. It is not to look at the information given to the person before they make their decision.

As Karen Heath, chief engagement officer at pension communication specialist AHC, says "information output is not the same as good communication".

As in Makkinga, good outcomes can be arrived at by controlling the urge to over-communicate. The UK pensions regulatory community should learn from its example. a


Richard Butcher is managing director at Pitmans Trustees Ltd

This article appeared in our November 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
11
Topics:
Soft skills

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ