Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2012
letters-to-the-editor-june-2012

Letters to the editor - July 2012

Open-access content Thursday 5th July 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

In which actuaries discuss the AGM, the actuarial exam and defined benefits

2

The editorial team welcomes readers' letters but reserves the right to edit them for publication. Please email [email protected]

The deadline for receiving letters for the July issue is 18 July.

The writer of the letter of the month receives a £25 Amazon voucher 


AGM absence is an own goal

If our Scottish Board is serious about raising our profession's profile north of the border, then I would like to suggest a simple, free and effective means of engaging Scottish companies, their shareholders and the general public: contributing to and attending AGMs. I recently attended Standard Life's AGM, where, interestingly, the entire board of directors seemed devoid of any actuaries. Moreover, I was the only actuary who spoke from the floor and I recognised only one other actuary in the entire audience. For a profession that once prided itself on being able to 'make financial sense of the future', our virtual absence from such a forum - where we could add value - cannot be right. And, of course, rather than being merely some parochial issue, this idea could easily be extended to UK plc. In her parting column last month, Jane Curtis seemed to think we have been successful in raising our profile. We may have come a long way, but celebrations are surely premature, so come on, let's get out there and be heard. 

Gerry Devenney, 1 June 2012

Multiple choice test

Here's one to warm students up for the next round of actuarial exams. Which would it be better to do first?


a) Change statutory pension increases from being linked to the retail price index (RPI) to being linked to the consumer price index (CPI), causing union uproar, significant additional advisory fees across the pensions industry and a Trust Deed lottery in occupational pensions, leading to resignations and disputes; or


b) Change the calculation methodology gradually over time, so that RPI and CPI converge?
This is a pass or fail question.

Mike Harrison, 12 June 2012

Demise of defined benefits

I have just read the summary of the Xafinity report in the news section of the June issue of The Actuary. I note that defined benefit (DB) plan assets in the UK are about two-thirds of liabilities. Bypassing the intricacies of the definition of liabilities, this suggests to me that if funding requirements and the associated panic buttons were set along the lines suggested in my May 2012 letter, many DB plans would not be considered in deficit. They would, therefore, be comfortable in continuing to make full benefit payments, including what I called bonuses, while they waited for the market turnaround for which we all hope. 


As a result, most DB retirees would not have to swallow immediate drops in their payout comparable to those that many current DC retirees must be seeing. Even those whose plans have no excess assets to support bonus payouts would often be no worse off than those DC folk who are taking haircuts now; they could, however, expect to see a recovery if and when the situation turned around and bonus payouts could be resumed. 


In terminating DB plans, participants would face permanent haircuts, but they would only be comparable to those that are being taken in defined contribution (DC) plans - all of them, not just those that terminate. 


Should we not rethink the rules before the DB plan disappears in the private sector?

Brian A Jones, 7 June 2012

400 Club membership truly broad

Anuj Sharma describes the membership '400 Club' as representing all aspects of the membership of the profession (Letters, June 2012). He may not be aware of just how wide it is. I am a member of the '400 Club' because I volunteered. I have been a junior clerk working for the Army since 2005. Prior to that I was a 'white van man'. My main use to the profession is that I remember why we did things in the past, thus improving the basis on which the future will be planned.
Robert Steel, 2 June 2012


Stop the brain-drain


Regularly in The Actuary we hear the Profession celebrating how there are more overseas student members. The Profession's policy of applying discounts for training actuaries overseas will of course mean a relative growth in overseas student membership; indeed, such policies have surely contributed to the Profession having to declare a shortage of actuaries in the UK. The Profession's higher charges for UK training are funding overseas expansion activities.
The growing supply of UK-trained actuaries abroad and ever-improving communications technology makes it inevitable that UK companies will relocate their actuarial departments overseas, leaving British actuaries on the dole, as companies take advantage of lower labour costs abroad.
UK actuaries who dismiss this scenario should refer to the IT, admin and call centre departments, where such exporting of jobs has already taken place.

David Thomas, 2 June 2012


The editorial team welcomes readers' letters but reserves the right to edit them for publication. Please email [email protected] The deadline for receiving letters for the August issue is 18 July.


This article appeared in our May 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
letters-to-the-editor-june-2012
Topics
Professional

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Catastrophe Modelling Analyst - London Market Broker

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum
Reference
145925

Senior Catastrophe Analyst

England, London
£65000 - £75000 per annum
Reference
145924

Life Actuary - Financial Reporting - Day Rate contract

Negotiable
Reference
145923
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ