Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2018
10

Tribunal: disciplinary panel hearing - charge of misconduct

Open-access content 8th October 2018

On 16-20 July 2018, the Disciplinary Tribunal Panel considered a charge of misconduct against Mr Robert Amos Oketch, FIA (‘the Respondent’).


The 
Respondent, while resident in South Africa, was commissioned in 2012 by the Retirement Benefits Authority (RBA) to prepare an independent actuarial report relating to a Kenyan pension scheme for presentation to a RBA tribunal in Kenya. The charge against the Respondent alleged that between September 2012 and March 2013, while appointed to prepare the independent actuarial report, he acted inappropriately in the manner in which he conducted himself and some of the assertions he made in the report, including failure to have regard to the scheme rules and local legislation.

The Panel found the majority of the parts of the charge proved. Further, the Panel found overall the matters found proved amounted to misconduct.

The Panel determined that the only appropriate and proportionate sanction was expulsion, no other sanction reflecting the damage to the reputation of the profession (and to another of its members) caused by the actions of the Respondent. This is the appropriate sanction because the Panel determined that the misconduct found proved was of such gravity that the reputation of the profession and the public interest required that the member should no longer able to practise or claim membership of the profession. The Respondent may not apply for readmission for a period of four years.

A copy of the Panel's full determination, including reasons, can be found on the IFoA's website here.

This article appeared in our October 2018 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Actuarial Analyst - Pensions to Life

London (Central)
study support, package
Reference
119042

Reinsurance Technician

London (Central)
Negotiable
Reference
119041

Pricing Actuary/Analyst (Casualty)

London, England
£60000 - £80000 per annum
Reference
119040
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200