Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2016
10

FCA publishes thematic review of non-advised annuity sales practices

Open-access content Tuesday 18th October 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has found no evidence of an industry-wide or systemic failure to provide customers with sufficient information about enhanced annuities through non-advised sales.

2


That is among findings of its thematic review of non-advised annuity sales practices.

It instigated the review to establish whether firms gave customers sufficient information about enhanced annuities and encouraged them to shop around to potentially secure a higher income.

The review looked at more than 1,200 non-advised sales of annuities made between May 2008 and April 2015 at seven firms which between them account for some two-thirds of this market.

Many firms provided clear and comprehensive information "with written communication tending to meet the standards required", it found.

But the FCA had concerns about cases where significant communications took place over the phone "which was likely to have caused some customers to purchase a standard annuity when they may have been eligible for an enhanced product".

These failings worried the FCA enough for it to ask those involved to review all non-advised sales from July 2008, and where appropriate provide redress.

Firms involved are also being investigated by the FCA's enforcement division to determine whether further action is necessary.

FCA director of supervision - investment, wholesale and specialist - Megan Butler said: "While we have found particularly poor behaviour at a small number of firms, there is no evidence that firms have systemically failed to provide customers with the information required by our rules.

"Firms, particularly those outside our sample, should look at the report we have published today and consider whether they can make improvements."

The FCA highlighted concerns it had found to the industry to take action, these included:

*    call handlers sometimes being heavily reliant on scripts, which meant that they were often unable to respond to clients' needs or clarify misunderstandings;
*    customers were not always made aware they could obtain a higher income by shopping around;
*    clear messages about enhanced annuities were sometimes undermined by subsequent comments which included call handlers under-playing the level of increase which a consumer may obtain by shopping around;
*    firms that did not sell enhanced annuities sometimes failed to mention these products to customers.

The FCA will oversee a further review in which a small number of the largest firms not in its original sample will review their non-advised annuity sales. 

Lansdown Hargreaves head of retirement policy Tom McPhail said: "The FCA's review has given the non-advised annuity sector a reasonably clean bill of health however they also found some failings which for a minority of customers may eventually lead to their getting some compensation.

"They also found that even where insurance companies follow the letter of the regulations, they still don't always communicate effectively with their customers.

"If you are buying an annuity you absolutely must shop around. In a small number of cases your existing pension provider may actually be able to offer you the best deal on the market but the chances are that they won't."

This article appeared in our October 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
10

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Risk Actuary - General Insurance

London (Greater)
£60,000 - £85,000
Reference
145934

Project Actuary - Life Insurance

Midlands
£60,000 - £110,000
Reference
145933

Model Validation Actuary

London (Greater)
£60k - £80k
Reference
145932
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ