Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2016
10

Cridland review proposes early access for those with lower life expectancy

Open-access content 11th October 2016

Hargreaves Lansdown has roped to the John Cridland review of the state pension age that pensions could be paid early to those in poor health.

2


Its proposal is that there would be early access from age 60 for people in poor health with the state pension expressed as both an income from state pension age and a capital sum if accessed ahead of that point.

The capital sum would be discounted to take account of early access and individuals would use that sum to purchase an annuity where it gave a higher income than the state pension.

Hargreaves Lansdown's head of retirement policy Tom McPhail said: "The state pension age needs to rise, to reflect general improvements in life expectancy across the population, because otherwise the whole scheme will eventually become unsustainably expensive. However we also need to accommodate those with poor life expectancy."

Varying the pension based on gender, post code, occupation or ethnicity would be arbitrary and potentially lead to unlawful discrimination and so he said: "a fairer and more efficient approach would be to use the underwriting expertise of specialist annuity providers, to target higher payouts to those individuals who have a lower life expectancy, whatever the reason for it".


This article appeared in our October 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Director of Investment Risk

London (Central)
+ comprehensive benefits
Reference
118783

Qualified Reporting and Process Improvement

London (Central)
£90,000 - £100,000
Reference
118762

Risk Actuary

London (Central)
Market Rates + 20% bonus + benefits
Reference
118782
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200