Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2016
10

People being 'left in limbo' when it comes to planning for future care costs

Open-access content Friday 7th October 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Just 6% of people aged over 45 have made financial plans to pay for their future care needs, a survey by Just Retirement has found.

2

A growing number of them felt it would be helpful for local councils to refer enquiries to independent financial advisers, the company's fifth Care Index report found, but few had consulted such advisers on their own initiative.

Results showed that councils were often the first port of call for information on accessing and paying for care, but 44% of respondents thought it should be standard policy for councils to refer people to financial advisers, and 56% thought such referrals would be helpful, up from 51% last year.

Results showed however, that financial intermediaries rank low when people consider sources of information, cited by only 9% of respondents.

The charity Age UK was mentioned by 50%, local authorities by 26%, Citizens Advice by 24% while 18% would rely on family and friends.

Just Retirement group communications director Stephen Lowe said: "Left alone, most people won't take formal financial advice but they seem to be open to being 'nudged' in that direction.

"It may help save some of the estimated £425m a year of extra cost to taxpayers due to self-funders running out of money to pay care bills."

The survey found increased realism about meeting care costs, with only 16% of people under the impression that the state would meet these, well down on the 51% who believe this in the 2012 survey.

Increased awareness of care costs was also evident, with for the first time since 2012 respondents overestimating the average cost of residential care at £30,830 a year, £334 higher than industry figures suggest.

Despite this, only 6% of over-45s had included the cost of care in their financial planning although 18% of people aged over 75 had done so.

Lowe said the results showed greater awareness of care costs but that more work was needed from the industry and Government to build on the momentum.

He said: "This will ultimately pay dividends in the future if we find that more people are considering how to meet care costs and are using trusted sources of information and advice to make smart, sustainable choices.

"Given the sums of money and complexity involved, professional advisers have every reason to see themselves as a key part of the solution."

The survey also revealed a lack of understanding of products available. Equity release was well-known, but only 16% were aware of care annuities and 12% of immediate needs insurance, while 77% did not believe that financial products existed that would pay care fees for as long as they needed.

Lowe said: "The new measures that have been introduced by the Care Act had the potential to clear up some of the misconceptions about funding care, but that doesn't seem to have happened, with six in 10 still saying they are 'confused', perhaps as a consequence of key parts such as the cap on care costs being delayed.

"Regular news coverage of a care crisis is making people generally aware that big problems exist but lack of detailed knowledge of important rules such as means-testing limits or whether they will need to sell their home is leaving them in limbo when it comes to planning or taking action."

This article appeared in our October 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Topics:
Health care

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ