Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • July 2016
07

FCA to face possible restructure following HBOS failure

Open-access content 27th July 2016

MPs are calling for a breakup in the structure of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and proposing a case for a new enforcement body, the Treasury Select Committee has said in a report.

hbos

MPs are calling for a breakup in the structure of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and proposing a case for a new enforcement body, the Treasury Select Committee has said in a report. 

An HBOS branch (credit not needed)


The committee's comments follow findings of a review by the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) into the failure of HBOS, and a report by Andrew Green QC last year on the decisions taken by the then regulator the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

MPs said that the functions of the FCA should be separated as a new body would "bolster the perception of the enforcement function's independence". The current system of the FCA is "outdated and can be construed as unfair" according to the committee.

"By moving enforcement away from supervision, it can focus independently on undertaking its key functions: interrogating evidence and assessing whether a regulatory breach has been committed," MPs said.

The committee believed the separation would allow all three regulators - the FCA, PRA and the enforcement body - to "enjoy much greater clarity over their objectives". 

"An FCA with fewer objectives, and a single separate body responsible for enforcement, would probably result in better accountability and better outcomes," it said.

However, the FCA stated it had a range of tools at its disposal of which enforcement was an essential one. 

A spokeswoman for the regulator added: "We believe that if this regulatory tool is separated from the FCA it would potentially lessen our ability to be an effective regulator and impact our ability to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of the UK financial system."

The Treasury Select Committee argued that the collapse of HBOS, along with other UK financial institutions during the crisis, was the result of prudential failings. 

It said it was "far from satisfactory" that the bulk of enforcement staff and expertise still lies within the FCA, which "has no role in prudential supervision of banks". MPs claimed an independent enforcement function could and should "sit equidistant between the PRA and FCA".

Troubled bank HBOS collapsed in 2008 and needed a £20.5bn government bailout. 

The committee criticised the former regulator, the FSA, for not being able to protect consumers from "spectacular regulatory failures".

The FCA said it had learned from its predecessor by changing a number of its processes.

However, it argued that the ultimate responsibility for the failure of HBOS rested with the board and senior management. 

"They failed to set an appropriate strategy for the firm's business and failed to challenge a flawed business model which placed inappropriate reliance on continuous growth without due regard to risks involved," said the FCA's spokeswoman. 

"In addition, flaws in the FSA's supervisory approach meant it did not appreciate the full extent of the risks HBOS was running and was not in a position to intervene before it was too late."

This article appeared in our July 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
07
Topics:
Regulation Standards
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Longevity Actuary – Reinsurance

London (Central)
£100,000
Reference
118949

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
118965

Capital Project Actuary

£500 - £850 per day
Reference
118964
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200