Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2016
05

UK government and regulators 'must do more' to tackle mis-selling, say MPs

Open-access content Monday 16th May 2016 — updated 1.47pm, Thursday 30th April 2020

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has called on government departments and regulators for more action in protecting consumers from the mis-selling of financial products.

2


The MPs' call follows an inquiry into the regulation and redress of the issue. According to the committee, more than 12 million consumers were mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI) and firms have paid more than £22bn in compensation since April 2011.

Based on the report Financial services mis-selling: regulation and redress, published last week, claims management companies (CMCs) have taken up to £5bn out of the compensation set aside for consumers.

The report explained that the process for those consumers to claim compensation through the Financial Ombudsman Service was "straightforward and free" but in the period 2014/15, 80% of such complaints were made through CMCs, who charged between a quarter and a third of any compensation paid. 

The PAC criticised the public bodies involved - the Treasury, the Ministry of Justice, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Ombudsman - for having been "too slow" in taking responsibility for the situation and "too passive" in allowing it to happen.

Chair of the PAC Meg Hillier said: "The widespread mis-selling of PPI is a vivid demonstration of the risks facing consumers in the financial services market."

In addition, the PAC noted the Ombudsman had a "large backlog of PPI claims", with many consumers having to wait for more than two years for a decision. 

They suggested by the end of July 2016 the Ombudsman should set out publicly a timetable and a report on its progress. 

Hillier said: "The fall-out is still with us. Many people have waited years for a decision on compensation and, because of the way they have pursued their claims, even then they may not receive the full amount. Serious risks of further mis-selling remain."

The PAC acknowledged that the FCA had taken "some action" to tackle the cultural problems behind mis-selling by financial services firms, but said that the regulator had not done enough. 

The FCA had previously withdrawn a planned review of the banks' culture, but the committee noted it had not said what culture it expected firms to have.

"There is no guarantee that any improvements in culture will stick as the regulatory spotlight moves away," said the committee.

It urged the FCA to outline the actions it will take to improve the culture in financial services firms. 

MPs also warned of the risks pension freedoms that could potentially trigger for future mass mis-selling and said the regulator needed to ensure that consumers understand the financial products they are buying and the possibility of claiming compensation.

In addition, the committee criticised the Treasury for not knowing how effective the FCA is in addressing the problem with "no good indicators" of the current level of mis-selling. 

It suggested the two bodies need to develop indicators on the extent of mis-selling, and assess regularly how effective their actions are in reducing it.

"It is vital the government and regulators take fresh action now to better protect taxpayers' interests, both in reducing the potential for mis-selling and, when it does occur, to ensure those affected get their due compensation," Hillier said. 

The FCA and the Treasury have yet to comment at the time of writing. 

This article appeared in our May 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
05
Topics:
General Insurance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ