Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2016
03

Chancellor introduces 'Lifetime ISA' for young people as alternative to pensions

Open-access content Wednesday 16th March 2016 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Chancellor George Osborne has announced that adults under the age of 40 will be able to open a ‘Lifetime ISA’ as a flexible saving vehicle.

2


In today's Budget statement, Osborne explained young people found pensions "too complicated and inflexible" and most faced an "agonising choice of either saving to buy a home or saving for their retirement".

The product will be launched on 6 April 2017. The chancellor promised those who open a lifetime ISA could save up to £4,000 each year and would receive a 25% bonus from the UK government on every pound they put in. Contributions can continue to be made with the bonus paid up to the age of 50.

Osborne said: "For every £4 you save, the government will give you £1. So put in £4,000 and the government will give you £1,000. You don't have to choose between saving for your first home or saving for your retirement. With the new Lifetime ISA the government is giving you money to do both."

Fiona Morrison, president of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA), welcomed the focus on encouraging saving, but added this could raise conflict with other pension savings products and boost opt-outs from auto-enrolment pension schemes.

She added: "In the Lifetime ISA, there appears to be no incentive for people to continue saving into it after 50, an age when many have greater discretionary spending.

"As people tend to underestimate how long they will live, this leaves a risk of people not saving enough to fund their retirement and running out of money, thereby leaving them to fall back on the state for support."

David Fairs, chairman of the Association of Consulting Actuaries, agreed the Lifetime ISA could challenge and conflict with other pension savings products and encourage opt-out rates.

Fairs said: "Whilst we support an initiative that looks to boost flexible savings for those aged under 40, it is difficult to see how this will sit comfortably alongside other pension saving schemes and products.  

"We wonder whether this initiative will undermine auto-enrolment and lead to more young people opting-out in favour of a more flexible savings product.  The government may need to consider whether auto-enrolment contributions should be allowed into Lifetime ISAs."

Stewart Hastie, pensions partner at KPMG, described the product as the chancellor's "testing ground for the Pensions ISA", which had been proposed before the Budget.

He said: "It gives the government the option to see how consumers react to the ISA option."

Eleanor Daplyn, partner at Sackers, called the product a "helpful initiative which addresses generational pensions inequality". However, Tamara Calvert, partner at DLA Piper, said many people would be confused with the third savings vehicle. 

"For example, will somebody who has just started saving into a pension understand the pros and cons of moving to a Lifetime ISA?" she said. 

"Communication of the benefits and tax treatment will be key, to make sure people make informed decisions about which savings vehicle is most appropriate for their needs … There is a danger that, faced with a confusing array of options, people may just opt-out entirely."

This article appeared in our March 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
03
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Manager - Employee Benefits

£2958.18 - £3549.82 per month
Reference
145973

Manager - Employee Benefits

£2958.18 - £3549.82 per month
Reference
145972

Portfolio Management/Business Planning Actuary

London (Central)
£100000 - £125000 per annum
Reference
145971
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ