Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2016
03

FAMR recommends early access to pensions to pay for advice

Open-access content 14th March 2016

The UK government should allow consumers to access a small part of their pension pot before the normal minimum pension age, to redeem against the cost of pre-retirement advice, Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR) has said.

2


This is one of the 28 proposals set out in a review, which addresses concerns about the affordability and accessibility of financial advice and guidance, published by the Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) today. 

It believed giving people a 'nudge' to seek advice well before the minimum pension age, currently 55, would leave individuals enough time to plan for, and if necessary set up their savings rate, ahead of retirement.

Malcolm McLean, senior consultant at Barnett Waddingham, said this was "probably worth a try". However, Graham Vidler, director of external affairs at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, said this may not guarantee greater affordability and accessibility of the service.

Vidler said: "Even if savers are allowed to access their pension pots early to pay for advice, the cost of which still represents a big proportion of the average pension pot. 

"An alternative approach is needed to support the great majority of savers who will continue to be excluded from financial advice, particularly when it comes to making decisions about their retirement incomes."

FAMR also called for the government to consult on changes to legislation to narrow the definition of regulated advice so that it is based on a personal recommendation. 

It believed this would create a single definition for the service and remove some of the barriers that exist for firms wishing to offer guidance services.

Tom McPhail, head of retirement policy at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "It should allow firms more latitude to deliver useful guidance without having to charge an advisory fee or worry about inadvertently straying into giving personalised advice."

Technology can also play an increasing role in creating a "more engaging, cost-effective advice market", according to the report. It recommended that the FCA extend the work of Project Innovate and establish a unit to help firms develop their automated advice models.

McLean said: "Although this is unlikely to actually be advice as such it will allow consumers to go on-line, answer some questions, and receive financial help without having to pay for individually tailored solutions, all of which should be positive and will help consumers to better understand the issues and what their next steps should be."

In addition, the report recommended a number of measures for the FCA to take forward which are aimed at giving firms the confidence to deliver 'streamlined' advisory services focusing on specific consumer needs. 

But McPhail warned this could allow "poor practices" in the industry, adding: "We're less convinced about extending the development process for advisers and the notion of 'streamlined' advice. Where regulated advice is given it should adhere to high standards. 

"There is a risk that these proposals could undermine this extremely important principle and allow poor practices to creep back into the industry."

This article appeared in our March 2016 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
03
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Life Reporting Actuary

London (Central)
£60000 - £70000 per annum
Reference
119822

Life Modelling Actuary

London (Central)
£60000 - £70000 per annum
Reference
119821

x2 Stress Testing Life Actuary

England
£65000 - £75000 per annum
Reference
119820
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200