Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • May 2015
05

Pension schemes will stay in deficit for longer as recovery plans are 'blown off course'

Open-access content Wednesday 13th May 2015 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Many defined benefit (DB) pension schemes with actuarial valuations this spring will find recovery plans for any deficit have been blown off course, says Towers Watson.

2

The firm said for a typical scheme with a March/April 2015 valuation, the employer would have to increase its contribution by around 30% to clear its deficit by the date previously agreed with trustees.

Towers Watson said the situation was due to lower bond yields, which had increased liabilities in pension schemes, but circumstances could vary from scheme to scheme. 

The analysis was based on a model scheme that was 80% funded at the end of March 2012 where the employer and trustees had agreed a 10-year recovery period.

Towers Watson also said alternatively, if contributions stayed the same, the date by which the plan would be fully funded against its statutory target would have to be pushed back by around two years.

Graham McLean, head of funding at Towers Watson, said: "New snapshots of scheme funding positions are not going to look pretty.

"Over the past three years, investments have performed strongly but lower bond yields have increased liabilities. Typically, cash deficits will be about where they were three years ago: the significant sums that employers have paid into their pension schemes have only allowed them to tread water. 

"However, the situation will vary a lot from scheme to scheme. Things won't be as bad where the scheme was well hedged against falls in interest rates or where the original plan was to pay off the deficit quickly."

McLean said due to uncertainty with yields, employers might try to "keep cash contributions down for fear of overpaying" while offering the scheme alternative security such as money in an escrow account, "in case things don't go as they hope".

Pension schemes are required to undertake actuarial valuations to value liabilities and assets. According to Towers Watson, employers and trustees must agree a recovery plan to repair any deficit and submit this to the Pensions Regulator within 15 months of the valuation date. 

Meanwhile, the firm has conducted a separate study and found for defined contribution (DC) schemes, change in pension legislation is "crowding out" employers' ability to focus on retirement adequacy. Its survey of more than 100 companies found 56% said compliance was one of the firms' top DC pension priorities. 

As part of Towers Watson 'Fit for Retirement' programme, which looks into the impact of recent pension changes, the survey found 38% of firms said workers' ability to retire was a top priority, 31% listed competitiveness and 30% named attraction and retention as a driver for pension provision. 

Phil Percival, head of Towers Watson's FiT Age programme, said: "Currently compliance is crowding out employers' ability to focus on retirement adequacy.

"Such a flurry of change is preventing companies from focusing on the real reason for providing pension plans - either for the employer, in terms of attraction and retention, or for the employee in terms of their ability to retire."

This article appeared in our May 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
05
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Deputy Head of Capital Modelling

London (Central)
£110000 - £130000 per annum
Reference
144789

Head of Analytics (Actuarial)

London (Central)
£130000 - £165000 per annum
Reference
144788

Pensions Actuarial Analyst - GMP Equalisation

London (Central)
£ dependent upon experience
Reference
143745
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ