Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • March 2015
03

City Noble director calls for ban on DB to DC pension scheme transfers

Open-access content 30th March 2015

A pensions advisory firm has called on the government to prohibit defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) pension scheme transfers.


30 MARCH 2015 | BY CINTIA CHEONG

Eamonn O’Connor, Director at City Noble. © City Noble

A City Noble director has said that, while there could be valid reasons for some consumers to switch, "very few" would benefit from the transfer. It felt the pension reform, which comes into force on 6 April, would add "further confusion and complexity to the regulatory framework".

Eamonn O'Connor said: "We have a dramatic pensions regime emerging with 'collective' schemes (DB and possibly collective DC) and 'individual' (all other types of DC). The changes lie not in their legal structures (trust or contract) but in their distributing of investment returns to members, along with the level of engagement expected of them."

O'Connor said it made "little sense" to allow members from collective DC schemes to transfer out, as it would go "against the principle of pooling risk through cross subsidy amongst members".

"The solution is straightforward," he said. "Rather than add further confusion and complexity to the regulatory framework, it would be better to ban the right to transfer from DB to DC schemes and the right to all the employee pension freedoms which ensue."

He added: "Both the Pensions Regulator and the Financial Conduct Authority are consulting on how best to implement the requirement that those exchanging safeguarded (for example, DB) for flexible (DC) benefits, presumably to take advantage of the new pension freedoms, must take advice. Both consultations are predicated on the (correct) assumption that such transfers will not be in most members' interests."

O'Connor said there would be two distinct "but separately coherent" pension regimes. While members of collective schemes would enjoy guarantees and predictability about their pension income and be "free from wrestling with complex decisions", individual members would have greater choice and freedom but without security.

Alan Collins, director at Spence, said there would be "absolutely no chance" of transfers being banned. He said: "When this was consulted on last year, it wasn't so much kicked into the long grass as launched into orbit. There was little support for the idea, which any case could have been very easily circumvented."

Collins said pension freedom was all about choice and this should not be "snatched away from a sizeable proportion of the pension saving community" and said any move to try to reverse the trend "would be a retrograde one".

He also said supporters of collective DC would be "relying on hope rather than expectation" that it would be introduced.

Malcolm McLean, senior consultant at Barnett Waddingham, said the ban is unlikely to be implemented. "The government is unlikely to do a U-turn on DB to DC transfers now, as it fits with their current philosophy of freedom and flexibility," he said.

This article appeared in our March 2015 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
03
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Longevity Proposition Development Actuary

London (Central)
£90,000 - £110,000 depending on experience
Reference
118704

Senior Financial Risk Actuary

London, England
£55000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
118752

Senior Reserving Analyst

England, London
£45000 - £60000 per annum
Reference
118751
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200