Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2014
09

British Property Federation reiterates Flood Re concerns

Open-access content 29th September 2014

The British Property Federation has accused the government of making ‘empty promises’ over the Flood Re scheme designed to ensure affordable insurance cover for people and properties in high flood-risk areas.

In its response to a government consultation on Flood Re, BPF warned that it would leave millions exposed to 'rocketing' insurance premiums.

The scheme, which is the result of a deal struck between the insurance industry and the government, will be financed by a national levy. It is set to be introduced next year to keep down the cost for cover for hundreds of thousands of households.

But BPF said it is concerned over the lack of flexibility in the regulations. The federation, which represents real estate owners and investors, argued that the scheme would not cover leasehold properties in large blocks, private rented homes, properties in council tax band H and those built after 2009.

The BPF wants the government to include leasehold properties within the scope of the scheme, adding that it would be 'grossly unfair' to discriminate between those who live in a house and those who live in a flat.

It said it had continually asked the government for proof that leaseholders would not be adversely affected by exclusion.

The government published its Flood insurance: regulations for the Flood Reinsurance Scheme consultation in July, looking into how the insurance industry could implement the new scheme. The deadline for submission was September 16. The government said it would monitor the impact on various excluded groups.

But BPF said it was 'anxious' over the government's proposal because the regulations showed no evidence of a mechanism that would allow Flood Re to be amended to include new categories of property at a later date. It added: 'The commitment to monitoring the effects on leaseholder properties is an empty one.'

Ian Fletcher, BPF director of policy, said: 'There is a last chance for parliament to amend the legislation on Flood Re, so that leaseholders, small businesses and other groups enjoy the safety net it provides.

'Having been campaigning for the inclusion of leasehold properties in Flood Re for a while, a repeated source of frustration has been the lack of explanation or evidence for many of the decisions made, and the regulations that have been set out so far do not do much to assuage these.'

Michelle Banks, chief executive of the Association of Residential Managing Agents, added: 'I am pleased that the government is committed to monitoring the Flood Re Scheme, and that there is industry-wide support for the regulations to ensure homes in high risk areas are able to access affordable insurance.

'However, I am concerned that there appears to be no mechanism to amend the regulations to include new properties at a later date.

'Without this the government's commitment to monitor the impact on leaseholder properties is an empty one, and the chances of leaseholders in high-risk areas who are currently excluded from Flood Re being added to the scheme are low.'

This article appeared in our September 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
09
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Longevity Actuary – Reinsurance

London (Central)
£100,000
Reference
118949

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
118965

Capital Project Actuary

£500 - £850 per day
Reference
118964
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200