Member of Council Kathryn Morgan was one of a select group asked to test the IFoAs new website, launched this month. Here she gives her opinion on the usability of the site and its look and feel
Michael Tobias FFA
On 21 May 2014, the Adjudication Panel determined that the respondent had failed to produce sufficient records to prove participation in continuing professional development (CPD) events entered on his record. The panel dismissed an allegation that the respondent had not complied with the CPD monitoring exercise. In accordance with Rule 4.4(a)(i), the panel invited the respondent to accept the following sanctions:
a reprimand; and
a fine of £750.
The respondent accepted that there
had been misconduct and accepted the
above sanctions.
Richard John Hall FIA
On 21 May 2014, the Adjudication Panel determined that the case report disclosed a prima facie case of misconduct in respect of an allegation that, between March 2013 and October 2013, the respondent in the employment of his previous employer sent confidential material to his personal email account for no legitimate business purpose, in contravention of clause 25 of his contract of employment. The Adjudication Panel dismissed two further allegations that did not disclose a prima facie case of misconduct.
In accordance with Rule 4.4(a)(i), the panel invited the respondent to accept the following sanctions:
a reprimand; and
a fine of £4,000.
The respondent accepted that there had been misconduct and accepted the sanctions.
See full reports at www.actuaries.org.uk
