Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • September 2014
09

IFoA: Adjudication Panel hearings

Open-access content 3rd September 2014

Member of Council Kathryn Morgan was one of a select group asked to test the IFoA’s new website, launched this month. Here she gives her opinion on the usability of the site and its look and feel

Michael Tobias FFA

On 21 May 2014, the Adjudication Panel determined that the respondent had failed to produce sufficient records to prove participation in continuing professional development (CPD) events entered on his record. The panel dismissed an allegation that the respondent had not complied with the CPD monitoring exercise. In accordance with Rule 4.4(a)(i), the panel invited the respondent to accept the following sanctions:

• a reprimand; and

• a fine of £750.

The respondent accepted that there 

had been misconduct and accepted the 

above sanctions. 


Richard John Hall FIA

On 21 May 2014, the Adjudication Panel determined that the case report disclosed a prima facie case of misconduct in respect of an allegation that, between March 2013 and October 2013, the respondent in the employment of his previous employer sent confidential material to his personal email account for no legitimate business purpose, in contravention of clause 25 of his contract of employment. The Adjudication Panel dismissed two further allegations that did not disclose a prima facie case of misconduct.

In accordance with Rule 4.4(a)(i), the panel invited the respondent to accept the following sanctions:

• a reprimand; and

• a fine of £4,000.

The respondent accepted that there had been misconduct and accepted the sanctions. 

 See full reports at www.actuaries.org.uk

This article appeared in our September 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
09
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Actuarial Analyst - Reinsurance Pricing

£40000 - £50000 per annum + bonus and excellent benefits
Reference
118841

Underwriting Assistant - Property (Lloyd's)

London (Central)
£30000 - £40000 per annum + benefits
Reference
118840

Reinsurance Pricing Lead

London (Central)
Negotiable
Reference
118839
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200