Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • June 2014
06

IFS casts doubt on affordability of Scots pension plan

Open-access content 3rd June 2014

Scottish Government plans to review the proposed increase in the state pension age if the country votes for independence could increase public spending by as much as £550m, according to a new economic analysis.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies today published figures examining the cost of independence. It concluded that the Holyrood administration's commitment to revisit the rise of the pension age would lead to more spending on both the state pension and other benefits.

Under current UK plans, the pension age will rise from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028.

The Scottish Government's independence white paper stated that, as life expectancy for both men and women in Scotland has consistently remained below the UK level, it was committed to reviewing the proposal.

However, the IFS stated this would not be enough to make the change affordable.

'Its cost will be determined by the fraction of people reaching 66 in the late 2020s and early 2030s. At 1.3% of the population that is forecast to be slightly higher in Scotland than in the rest of the UK (1.2%),' the report concluded.

David Phillips, a senior research economist at the IFS and one of the authors of the report, said Scotland faced a deficit of around 5% of economic output in 2016/17 if it became independent. This would not be sustainable for a prolonged period, and extra costs such as cancelling the rise in pension age would need to be paid for by tax rises or spending cuts elsewhere, he said.

'While the white paper contains some measures that could help balance the books, the spending increases and tax cuts pledged or hinted at are substantially larger.

'In a difficult fiscal context, such giveaways make the job of restoring the public finances to health more difficult, and would require bigger spending cuts or tax rises in other areas. Thus, underlying the seemingly attractive policies outlined in the white paper are difficult, unmentioned, decisions for other public services, benefits and taxes.'

Today's reports -Policies for an independent Scotland? Putting the Independence White Paper in its fiscal context and Taxation, government spending and the public finances of Scotland: updating the medium term outlook ­- are the latest to examine the affordability of Scottish pensions after independence.

The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries has already urged the Scottish Government to set out more details of its plans for spending on the state pension if the country votes yes on September 18.

Responding to the report, a Scottish Government spokesman said Scotland is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, more prosperous per head than France, Japan and the UK, but needed independence to enable that wealth to be shared and to build a fairer society.

'An independent Scotland's finances in 2016-17 will be similar to, or stronger than, both the UK and the G7 industrialised countries as a whole, and even on the IFS's projections, Scotland's public finance balance sheet in the first year of independence will be healthier than the UK's was in the most recent financial year.'

This article appeared in our June 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
06
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Longevity Proposition Development Actuary

London (Central)
£90,000 - £110,000 depending on experience
Reference
118704

Senior Financial Risk Actuary

London, England
£55000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
118752

Senior Reserving Analyst

England, London
£45000 - £60000 per annum
Reference
118751
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200