Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • April 2014
04

Webb's flat tax relief proposal 'complicated' and 'tricky', say actuaries

Open-access content Thursday 17th April 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Actuaries have warned that a recent suggestion by the pensions minister to introduce a flat rate of 30% tax relief on pensions for everyone could ‘complicate things’, particularly for defined benefit schemes.

Steve Webb's proposals emerged in an interview with the Daily Mail, published yesterday. He said he wanted to see the benefits of pensions tax relief spread much more evenly across the workforce.

The Liberal Democrat minister argued that people who get it at 40% tax relief 'get shed loads', adding that: 'If you gave everybody 30% then that spreads it much more evenly. Clearly that is not government policy, it is not even Lib Dem policy yet - but I'm working on that.'

He questioned why there wasn't a simpler system saying that, if his idea actually become a policy, 'you probably don't need a lifetime allowance'.

Webb also revealed that the government was considering giving people an estimate on their life expectancy when they reach retirement age following the new flexibilities for pensioners announced in the March Budget.

But Malcolm McLean, a Barnett Waddingham consultant, told The Actuary that: '[Webb's idea] would complicate things a little because occupational schemes and defined benefit schemes in particular [operate in a system where] contributions are deducted from the person earnings before tax. And the tax allowance is simply taxed in the normal way, which is automatically simple to do.

'Whereas, if you had a standard rate of tax you'd have to change the system slightly... it could be done but you'd have to jump around with the figures a bit. You'd have to deduct the pension contributions from the gross earnings to arrive at the taxable earnings, then you'd have to increase those taxable earnings slightly to compensate the fact that you didn't want the people to get 40% relief and you only wanted them to get 30%.'

However he said that the proposed policy would likely get more people to join pension schemes. 

Echoing McLean, actuaries Towers Watson said a single rate of tax relief for everyone would be 'tricky' and was a policy in the 'easier said than done' category.

It said if the government did introduce a flat 30% tax relief rate, it would possibly require higher-rate taxpayers to pay a 10% benefit-in-kind tax on money that their employers contribute to pensions for them.

'Unless it did this, 40% taxpayers would be able to get 40% relief indirectly, by giving up salary in return for higher employer pension contributions on which they would not have to pay tax,' stated the firm.

'Making employees pay tax on employer contributions would get tricky in relation to DB schemes - and therefore in relation to public sector employees who pay 40% tax.'

But others welcomed the proposal. Hargreaves Lansdown said Webb's idea was 'interesting' and had 'merit'.

'I think the trade-off of moving to a flat tax relief rate, which would be a loss for higher earners but offsetting that with the removal of lifetime allowance is potentially a viable proposition,' Tom McPhail, head of the pension research at the firm told The Acutary.

 

 

This article appeared in our April 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
04
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ