Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2014
02

PwC: actuarial valuation process 'takes too long and costs too much'

Open-access content Monday 3rd March 2014 — updated 11.05am, Tuesday 5th May 2020

Actuarial valuations take a bizarrely long time to complete and the process distracts defined benefit pension schemes from real strategic issues, a major consultancy firm warned today.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Pension Group also said the actuarial valuations process carried out by pension schemes takes too-long and costs too much to complete. Raj Mody head of the PwC's pensions practice group suggested that this exercise could be cut by two thirds.

According to the firm, the statutory time period for completing an actuarial valuation should take five months instead of 15 months as it does currently. This would make the pensions industry's management of pension schemes more efficient, give earlier clarity to trustees and sponsors of the financing arrangements and free up time to focus on other risk management issues, PwC said.

'When you think that a corporate plc signs off its audited accounts within a few months of its year-end, it's bizarre to see pension scheme actuarial valuations take as long as 15-months to complete after their effective date,' Mody continued.

'Of course, the negotiation between parties does require some time, but the process could easily be condensed to a third of the time it currently takes even allowing for this.

'The pensions industry should be striving for efficiency where possible as this will benefit trustees, sponsoring companies and their members.'

PwC has drawn up a five-point plan to change the traditional process in the pensions industry.

It said: data should be prepared in readiness for use at valuation date; the strategy for financing and risk management shouldn't be included in the valuation's timetable; initial analysis of the asset and liability position should be made available within a week of the valuation date; up-to-date technology platforms should be used so that variations to results are explored in real time; and duplication should be avoided, with advisers operating from one calculation platform. 

PwC also said a more proactive approach to formulating an integrated risk management strategy would simplify the actuarial valuation process.

Mody added: 'The [Pensions] Regulator's focus on integrated risk management plans is absolutely a move in the right direction. Many schemes are currently approaching valuations the wrong way round by considering how much needs to be paid into the pension scheme and when, trying to use a budgeting process to formulate your whole pension scheme strategy.

'Instead, the strategy should come first, and then you can manage all the consequences, including the funding approach, in a way which is consistent with the strategy.'

Agreeing with PwC, Calum Cooper, head of Trustee DB at Hymans Robertson said the traditional approach takes too long to help trustees capture opportunities. 

Cooper said: 'The answer is to evolve the process rather than relegate it to the scrap heap and still pay for the privilege. Valuations should embrace technology and evolve the focus to cover all risks to member outcomes: covenant, cash and investments.

'The valuation can and should be used to improve member outcomes. Yes it needs to be quicker - and with technology today it can be. And yes it needs to be risk based rather than simply a one dimensional budgeting exercise.'


This article appeared in our February 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
02
Topics
Risk & ERM

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Risk Actuary - General Insurance

London (Greater)
£60,000 - £85,000
Reference
145934

Project Actuary - Life Insurance

Midlands
£60,000 - £110,000
Reference
145933

Model Validation Actuary

London (Greater)
£60k - £80k
Reference
145932
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ