Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2014
02

CBI and TUC unite in criticism of TPR DB funding proposals

Open-access content Friday 28th February 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Business leaders and trade unions have joined together to criticise the Pensions Regulator’s draft guidance on defined benefit funding for taking a too rigid approach that is likely to encourage trustees towards ‘excessively prudent’ choices.

In a joint letter to the regulator, the CBI and the Trades Union Congress set out their concerns about the current draft guidance on funding.

A TPR consultation on DB funding closed on February 7. It included a draft funding code providing practical guidance to help pension trustees meet legislative requirements and a draft strategy setting out its future approach to regulation.

These are intended to help pension trustees understand and manage risk in their schemes.

But the CBI and TUC claimed in their response to the consultation that: 'The draft code of practice risks preventing the objective from being implemented successfully. The TUC and the CBI agree that the regulator's current guidance takes too rigid an approach and is likely to drive trustee behaviour towards excessively prudent funding of schemes.

'We are concerned that, far from minimising risk, the regulator's approach may increase the chances that employee benefit rights cannot be met.'

Both bodies called for greater flexibility to encourage cooperation between businesses and trustees and to allow individual solutions to be found for each pension scheme.

They also stated that they were keen to ensure schemes were not driven towards unnecessary de-risking.

TPR's interim chief executive Stephen Soper said: 'The principles in our new draft DB code of practice are designed to encourage better dialogue between employers and scheme trustees in order that plans can be agreed that better manage risk and facilitate growth in the employer.

'It is our role to balance the needs of employers, members and the Pension Protection Fund. In the vast majority of cases, there should be no conflict between these objectives as a thriving business is in everyone's best interests.'

The majority of concerns expressed in consultation responses could be added, he added. The finalised code and regulatory strategy would strike the right balance when published in early May, said Soper.

The CBI represents 240,000 businesses and the TUC speaks on behalf of 6.2 million workers.

This article appeared in our February 2014 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Replace state pension with individual DC pots, says think-tank

State pensions and public sector pension schemes should be scrapped and replaced with individual defined contribution pots, according to recommendations from a Scottish think-tank
Thursday 27th February 2014
Open-access content

Medical underwriting increasingly popular buy-in option, says Towers Watson

Medical underwriting in buy-ins is gathering pace and could soon be the only option available for smaller defined benefit schemes, actuaries Towers Watson have claimed.
Wednesday 26th February 2014
Open-access content

Help with retirement planning 'not a priority for most employers'

Providing an adequate retirement income for UK employers is not a priority for most businesses, actuaries Towers Watson have revealed.
Monday 3rd March 2014
Open-access content

UK DB schemes paying more for buyouts, says Mercer

Defined benefit schemes in the UK pay a lot more to transfer liabilities to a regulated insurer than schemes in other countries, according to Mercer’s Global pension buyout index.
Tuesday 25th February 2014
Open-access content

Pensions Bill to place transparency requirement on funds

Pension funds will be forced by the government to disclose all hidden costs in defined contribution workplace schemes, pensions minister Steve Webb has revealed
Monday 24th February 2014
Open-access content

More than one way to a bulk annuity buy-in, says Aon

UK pension schemes should examine reshaping their benefit structures before entering into a standard bulk annuity to avoid ‘unaffordable’ inflation-hedging fees, Aon Hewitt has said.
Friday 21st February 2014
Open-access content
Filed in
02
Topics
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Reserving Analyst

London (City of)
Negotiable
Reference
149485

Senior GI Modeler - Capital and Planning

London (Central)
£ excellent
Reference
149436

Risk Oversight Manager

Flexible / hybrid with a minimum of 2 days per week office-based
£ excellent
Reference
149435
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ