Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2014
02

IFS calls for pension tax reforms

Open-access content Thursday 6th February 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Reforms to end the ‘extraordinarily generous’ tax treatment of pensions could raise as much as £10.8bn a year for the Treasury, according the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

2

In its annual Green budget yesterday, the think-tank said it was hard to justify the current regime in the current austerity period. Roughly three-quarters of pension contributions - those made by employers - escape national insurance contributions, while around a quarter of private pension entitlements can be taken entirely free of income tax.

The IFS said the obvious solution would be to start charging NICs on employer pension contributions, which would be an improvement on the current system. 'It is hard to justify the extraordinarily generous treatment of employer pension contributions, which escape NICs entirely. Making employer pension contributions subject to employer NICs could raise an estimated £10.8bn a year,' the think-tank said in its assessment of the economy.

An alternative approach would be to start charging NICs on pensions when they are paid out, which would raise an estimated £350m for every percentage point of tax levied.

'One could argue that such a change could help to spread the government's fiscal consolidation plan more evenly across the generations since income tax and benefit reforms announced to date have, on average, reduced the incomes of pensioners by less than those of working-age individuals,' the IFS said.

The IFS also argued that in order to stop up to a quarter of a pension pot escaping income tax altogether, a 'strong argument would be to cap the tax-free lump sum'.

It stated: 'It is also hard to see why people with very large pension pots should be able to draw a lump sum of as much as £312,500 tax-free.' However, the IFS stated there was no case to place further restrictions on the tax relief that can be claimed on pension contributions.

'There is a myth that further restricting income tax relief on contributions to private pensions would be an equitable and largely harmless way of raising substantial sums of money,' the Green Budget stated.

'It would not be. It would impose a degree of double taxation on pension saving. It would also further disadvantage young savers relative to current pensioners, and would add more complexity for those in defined benefit pension schemes.'

Responding to the report, Hargreaves Lansdown said that while there may be savings to be had for the Treasury through NIC changes, the effect on the UK pension system could be calamitous.

Head of corporate research Laith Khalaf added: 'Employers are already footing the bill for auto-enrolment, while trying to keep their heads above water in a difficult economy.

'Many already do much more than their legal obligations in providing pensions for their staff, hitting them with an £11bn tax bill would make them seriously question why they are doing this.'

This article appeared in our February 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
02
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Environmental, Social and Governance- GI Actuary

England, London
£70000 - £170000 per annum
Reference
145888

Calling All Australian Actuaries

England, London
£50000 - £120000 per annum
Reference
145887

Calling all GI Actuaries looking to move into contracting

England, London
£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
145886
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ