Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2014
02

An informed view of Scottish independence

Open-access content Wednesday 5th February 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Sarah Mathieson, head of research and knowledge at the IFoA speaks about furthering actuarial science

On 18 September 2014, the Scottish electorate will be asked "Should Scotland be an independent country?". As actuarial professionals working in financial services - in Scotland, the rest of the UK or overseas - we should be taking note of this debate. 

Putting aside the implications for European politics and the precedent that a 'yes' vote could have, the likelihood is that, regardless of the outcome, there will be change. At present, opinion polls suggest a 'no' vote, following which the Scottish government will surely try to gain further powers from Westminster in areas such as taxation and welfare. However, just a few months prior to the last Scottish elections, the opinion polls suggested a victory for Labour, yet the result was a thumping victory for the Scottish National Party (SNP). A 'yes' vote in September would result in substantial changes as Scotland gets to grips with just what it means to be independent. The effect on financial services and the working lives of actuaries in Scotland and throughout the UK and overseas would be considerable. 

For this reason, the IFoA has spent the past year engaging with all sides of the debate: the 'yes' campaign, the 'no' campaign, Westminster and Holyrood. Just over a year ago, the Scottish Board and the Public Affairs and Consultations Committee agreed that IFoA policy should be neutral on the question of the referendum. A working party, which I chair, was established to look at the issues raised by the debate for our profession. We produced lists of questions on a wide range of financial matters and presented these at member events in Edinburgh and London. Interestingly, the feedback from members was overwhelmingly in favour of stronger engagement by the IFoA in this debate. We responded with a follow-up paper in October 2013, 'Commentary on the key challenges facing an independent Scotland within financial services', which generated a significant level of national and regional media coverage.

Our engagement has also had a beneficial effect on our public affairs programme. We have received positive feedback on our involvement from representatives of both the 'yes' and 'no' campaigns and from other organisations, all of whom recognise the IFoA's politically neutral position. When I spoke to him on the phone late last year, the Secretary of State for Scotland said "the IFoA's approach is a model that others can follow". We will continue to meet stakeholders and scrutinise materials published by all sides. Our aim is to make sure that the issues affecting financial services and our profession get the attention they deserve. For this reason, the IFoA is co-sponsoring a series of seminars by the David Hume Institute, held in January and February 2014, with speakers from all the major political parties. On 20 March at The Hub, Edinburgh, the IFoA is hosting a Question Time-style debate that asks 'What are the implications of Scottish independence for the financial services sector?' This debate will be chaired by Bill Jamieson, former executive editor of The Scotsman, and speakers will include Alistair Darling MP, Alistair Carmichael MP, Secretary of State for Scotland, and John Swinney MSP, cabinet secretary for finance, employment and sustainable growth. This high-profile event will be open to members and non-members and offers the chance to question our panel and contribute to the debate. 

To my mind, there are many major questions. What might the economy of an independent Scotland look like? Will it stay in the EU? How would taxation change? What kind of financial markets would exist and how would the Scottish government support them? What cross-border arrangements would need to operate for financial services between Scotland and the UK? What aspects could remain shared between the two countries? How would independence affect the person in the street? 

Our debate on 20 March promises to be an engaging evening that feeds into further engagement work by the IFoA. I look forward to seeing many of you there.

 To book your free place, email [email protected]

 To learn more about the IFoA's engagement in the Scottish debate, visit www.actuaries.org.uk/members/pages/scottish-board

This article appeared in our February 2014 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

Gaining Momentum

Sarah Mathieson, head of research and knowledge at the IFoA speaks about furthering actuarial science
Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content

New home for IFoA

Sarah Mathieson, head of research and knowledge at the IFoA speaks about furthering actuarial science
Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content

SIAS workshops

Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content
2

SA actuarial ConneXion

Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content
2

The Other Half Club - the first quarter century

Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content
2

Philanthropy - Never has it been more necessary

Wednesday 5th February 2014
Open-access content

Latest from February 2014

Help with retirement planning 'not a priority for most employers'

Providing an adequate retirement income for UK employers is not a priority for most businesses, actuaries Towers Watson have revealed.
Monday 3rd March 2014
Open-access content
ta

PwC: actuarial valuation process 'takes too long and costs too much'

Actuarial valuations take a bizarrely long time to complete and the process distracts defined benefit pension schemes from real strategic issues, a major consultancy firm warned today.
Monday 3rd March 2014
Open-access content

CBI and TUC unite in criticism of TPR DB funding proposals

Business leaders and trade unions have joined together to criticise the Pensions Regulator’s draft guidance on defined benefit funding for taking a too rigid approach that is likely to encourage trustees towards ‘excessively prudent’ choices.
Friday 28th February 2014
Open-access content

Latest from no_opening_image

TPR publishes coronavirus guidance

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance to help UK pension trustees, employers and administrators deal with the financial and regulatory risks posed by coronavirus.
Monday 23rd March 2020
Open-access content
web_p24_cat-and-fish_iStock-483454069.png

Sensitivity analysis: swimming lessons

Silvana Pesenti, Alberto Bettini, Pietro Millossovich and Andreas Tsanakas present their alternative approach to sensitivity analysis
Wednesday 4th March 2020
Open-access content
ta

IFoA adjudication panel: Mr Jack Wicks, student

On 30 October 2019 the Adjudication Panel considered an allegation of misconduct against Mr Jack Wicks (the respondent).
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from missing_standfirst

news in brief

March news in brief

Paper: A Cashless Society in 2019 Cash is under pressure. A tense 2018 led to a tumultuous 2019: Facebook's announcement of plans to launch its Libra cryptocurrency with a consortium of companies united all regulators against the project.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content
2

Forging new paths

The Terminator is coming!  At least that's one potential vision of the future, invoked by Boris Johnson at the UN last year while he speculated about artificial intelligence (AI). We can certainly debate how realistic that vision is, and what the possible timescales might be.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content
2

Expert advice

This edition of the magazine focuses on data science and its applications, which will be a recurring theme for the IFoA.
Friday 28th February 2020
Open-access content

Latest from 02

Help with retirement planning 'not a priority for most employers'

Providing an adequate retirement income for UK employers is not a priority for most businesses, actuaries Towers Watson have revealed.
Monday 3rd March 2014
Open-access content
ta

PwC: actuarial valuation process 'takes too long and costs too much'

Actuarial valuations take a bizarrely long time to complete and the process distracts defined benefit pension schemes from real strategic issues, a major consultancy firm warned today.
Monday 3rd March 2014
Open-access content

CBI and TUC unite in criticism of TPR DB funding proposals

Business leaders and trade unions have joined together to criticise the Pensions Regulator’s draft guidance on defined benefit funding for taking a too rigid approach that is likely to encourage trustees towards ‘excessively prudent’ choices.
Friday 28th February 2014
Open-access content
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Pricing Trading Manager - Contract

£700 - £1000 per day
Reference
148579

Head of Financial Risk

Flexible / hybrid working with minimum 2 days p/w office-based
£ excellent package
Reference
148578

Insurance Risk Leader

Flexible / hybrid with 2 days p/w office-based
£ to attract the best
Reference
148577
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ