Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2014
01

High Court rules in PPF's favour on levy calculations

Open-access content Thursday 30th January 2014

Pension schemes will face difficulties in challenging the levy amounts they are required to pay to the Pension Protection Fund after the High Court ruled in the fund’s favour


30 JANUARY 2014 | BY JUDITH UGWUMADU

The ruling, issued last week, means the PPF's cash demands stand even if they are based on out-of-date financial information. 

The case involved the West of England Ship Owners Insurance Services Limited Retirement Benefits Scheme, which challenged the PPF when it increased the scheme's levy from zero to £168,000 in 2010/11. 

The scheme trustees complained to the PPF ombudsman that Dun & Bradstreet, PPF's credit rating agency, had used old information to calculate its risk score. This information led to the PPF to conclude that the mutual insurer was less financially sound that it was and therefore increasing its levy demand. 

Following this initial complaint, the ombudsman found in the scheme's favour, but the PPF appealed the decision at the High Court, which ruled in the fund's favour.

A PPF spokesperson said: 'We are pleased with the judgment as it confirms that our approach to the use of failure scores in the levy calculation is correct. 

'It underlines how important it is for all levy payers to engage with our insolvency risk provider to make sure they have all of the information they need to provide us with accurate failure scores for use in our levy calculations. This particularly remains the case when we move to a new insolvency risk provider for the triennium commencing in 2015/16.'

Lesley Browning, partner at solicitors Norton Rose Fulbright, which acted for the West of England Ship Owners Insurance scheme, told The Actuary there was little chance of D&B's procedures being 'attacked' by schemes in this way in future. 'In effect, what it means is that whatever D&B says, goes,' she said.

But she noted that when the PPF switches to Experian as insolvency risk provider to calculate the scores for the 2015/16 levy 'the system might be a bit different then'. 

'The PPF are certainly talking about Experian providing a more bespoke service, although I'm not sure that anyone actually knows what that means. But I suspect that this element of the process won't change much because I think the levy rules will just be updated to say that whatever Experian provides, the ordinary cause of business is what goes.'   

Nick Griggs, partner at Barnett Waddingham, suggested that the ruling was a timely warning that data issues arising from the crossover to Experian should be identified and addressed promptly to lessen the risk of overstated levy charges. 

He said: 'Even before the switch to Experian comes the new D&B model for calculating insolvency probabilities, which may yet come into effect by 31 March this year and may focus on new areas where companies have not had the opportunity to review and optimise their information. I would not expect retrospective changes to the month-end D&B scores to be allowed so it will be vital that you review your new D&B score promptly.'

This article appeared in our January 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
01
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Motor Pricing Manager

London, England
£60000 - £80000 per annum
Reference
120910

Mixed Reserving & Capital Role

London, England
£80000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
120909

Risk Management Actuary (Capital Modelling)

England, London
£70000 - £90000 per annum
Reference
120908
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2021 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200