Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2014
01

IFoA welcomes charge cap delay

Open-access content Monday 27th January 2014 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Actuaries have backed the government’s decision to delay implementation of the charge cap for defined contribution pensions and called for more focus on the quality of schemes

Last week, pensions minister Steve Webb confirmed that the charge cap for DC schemes would be delayed until at least April 2015. He said the timing of changes and the potential effect on auto-enrolment 'didn't quite stack up'. 

Many in the pensions industry welcomed the moving, saying the government's initial timescale was far too restrictive. 

The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries agreed that delaying the implementation of the charge cap made sense. 

Jim Boyle, chair of the pensions board at the IFoA, said: 'There is a lot of change underway in pensions at the moment; people need time to understand these changes and employers need time to understand both the changes and their implications.'

He added that employers providing pension provision through auto-enrolment over the next two years would need time to review the options available.

In October, the Department for Work and Pensions proposed three possible capping regimes: 1% of funds under management; a lower charge cap of 0.75% of funds under management; and a two-tier 'comply or explain' cap.

But Boyle said: 'Low charges do not necessarily equate to good outcomes or indeed good value, and we believe the structure of a pension scheme is an important factor that should also be considered. We want to see a focus on good outcomes for scheme members beyond retirement, rather than just one small piece of the puzzle.'

Webb's decision was criticised by Gregg McClymont, his Labour opposite number, who claimed it would leave pension savers worse off.

'Capping pension charges would help families in Britain who are facing a cost-of-living crisis,' he said. 

'The government's decision to delay the introduction of a cap on pension charges is another example of its failure to stand up for interests of savers.' 

But Paul Jayson, a partner at actuarial firm Barnett Waddingham, told The Actuary that, while looking at charges was important, it was better to get the structure of a pension scheme right first. 

He said the delay wasn't as big an issue as Labour had made it out to be.

'Investment management performance is more important than charges and you have to pay a bit more to get better quality,' said Jayson.

'What I wouldn't want to do is stifle innovation in the market by having charging handcuffs on too early.'

He said that a cap should be introduced at around the 18-24-month mark to allow schemes to develop and reach a quality standard.

'But while the market is young and funds are small, charges make less difference.'

This article appeared in our January 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
01
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ. Tel: 020 7880 6200