Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2014
01

Think-tank demands tougher action on state pension 'time bomb'

Open-access content Wednesday 8th January 2014 — updated 5.50pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Government plans to increase state pension expenditure have been slammed by a Right-wing think-tank as ‘unaffordable’ and ‘irresponsible’

In a report published today, the Institute of Economic Affairs urged the government to accelerate the introduction of a later retirement age and to urgently reform labour market regulations to enable people to work longer.

The Income from work - the fourth pillar of income provision in old age report makes ten policy recommendations to address what it called the 'state pension time bomb'.

Among these is the suggestion that the government consider the introduction of a compulsory private pension provision to replace the state pension. This means that any payments from the government to older people would be means-tested, reflecting the Australian model, which uses a system of compulsory private pension provision.

'Pressure on the public finances [in Australia] has been successfully alleviated through [this model]... These reforms saw employers putting aside at least 9% of employees' pre-tax earnings into a personal fund. Under such arrangements, individuals who choose to retire later benefit financially,' the think-tank said.

Philip Booth, editorial and programme director at the IEA, added: 'The government needs to wake up to the reality of the long-term state of the public finances.' 

He also said, on average, people retire earlier today than they did in the 1960s despite huge improvements in life expectancy. 

'People should have both the opportunity and incentive to continue some form of paid work into older age. Policymakers must urgently implement a coherent package of reforms, including a more rapid increase in the retirement age and a substantial reduction in employment protection legislation which is especially damaging to older people,' Booth continued.

The think-tank called for the state pension age for men and women to be increased by two months every quarter from November 2018, which would see the pension age hit 68 in January 2023. From January 2023, the state pension age should be tied to life expectancy, the IEA added.  

Gabriel Sahlgren, author of the report, said the current state pension system was incentivising early retirement, while employment protection legislation deters employers from taking on older workers.

People should be choosing to retire later, he said, as this brought both improved health and higher retirement income for individuals as well as savings for the taxpayer.

In response, a DWP spokeswoman said: 'This government abolished the discrimination of a default retirement age and is reforming state pension age to ensure it reflects changes to life expectancy.  We are introducing a simpler, flat rate state pension and will have a regular review of state pension age in the future, while automatic enrolment means millions more people will be saving for a pension with a contribution from their employer.'

At the weekend, Prime Minister David Cameron said that a Conservative government would continue to implement the ‘triple-lock’, which raises the state pension by at least 2.5% each year, until 2020.

This article appeared in our January 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
01
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ