Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • January 2014
01

Webb's annuity-switching plan gets scathing response

Open-access content 6th January 2014

Industry experts have rubbished the pensions minister’s suggestion that pensioners be allowed to switch to better-paying annuities in a similar way to homeowners re-mortgaging

Steve Webb's New Year's message attracted little support and pension experts said the minister's priorities should be focused on encouraging retirees to shop around for the best annuities rather than the possibility of switching deals. 

And in further criticism, Webb was accused for having a 'thoughtless' plan.

Phil Loney, group chief executive of the Royal London Group mutual life and pensions company, said: 'The pensions minister has clearly not thought this one through.'

He noted that, when purchasing an annuity, savers are buying a guaranteed income for life.

'If people are able to switch annuities mid term it introduces another variable and the guaranteed income becomes very difficult to price correctly. The impact of switchable annuities would therefore be to drive down the guaranteed income that savers are able to secure with an annuity. This presumably is not the outcome that the pensions minister is looking for.'

Echoing Loney, Mark Wood, chief executive of JLT Employee Benefits, said that comparing an annuity to a mortgage was 'misleading'. 

'A mortgage simply finances the purchases of a house while an annuity guarantees an income for life, however long an individual lives. Allowing people to chop and change runs the risk of making this guarantee unaffordable.'

Wood added: 'With annuity rates at historic lows, allowing switching as rates improve may well encourage those deferring the purchase of their annuity on the expectation of better rates in the future to commit to an annuity at this point in time.'

At Hargreaves Lansdown, head of pensions research Tom McPhail said: '[The government] should not try to invent products which either exist already or aren't likely to be good value for money.'

Webb's proposal emerged during an interview with the Sunday Telegraph. He said it could end the current 'lottery' in which traps many pensioners in potentially 'poor-value' schemes until they die. 

He said there was a need to address 'the whole issue of costs' for people buying annuities as well as the 'hidden charges' imposed by insurers. 

'When you take out a mortgage, in a few years if the rates change you can switch your mortgage,' he said. 

'But when you take out an annuity, that's it - for life. This could be for a quarter of a century. Why shouldn't you be able to change your annuity provider so a few years later somebody else could offer you a bigger pension? Why shouldn't you be able to shop around?'  

In November, Webb signalled an annuities market review at a debate organised by the Westminster Employment Forum. At the time he said that the government needed to take a 'broader' look at the annuities market after responding to expressed concerns by a range of commentators and advisers that it was not working well or in the interests of growing numbers of consumers.

He said: 'I ask myself the question why should annuity purchase be something that you only ever do once.

'A bog standard annuity may not be the answer for growing numbers of people. We need a much broader look at this across government.'

This article appeared in our January 2014 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
01
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Longevity Proposition Development Actuary

London (Central)
£90,000 - £110,000 depending on experience
Reference
118704

Senior Financial Risk Actuary

London, England
£55000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
118752

Senior Reserving Analyst

England, London
£45000 - £60000 per annum
Reference
118751
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200