Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2013
12

DWP slammed over 'inadequate' consultation on pension charges cap

Open-access content Thursday 19th December 2013

A government advisory body has heavily criticised the Department for Work and Pensions’ assessment of the impact of a cap on pension charges for schemes under auto-enrolment as ‘not fit for purpose’.

2

In October, ministers proposed implementing caps on charges. These included a limit of 1% of funds under management; a lower charge cap of 0.75% of funds under management; and a two-tier 'comply or explain' cap on workers automatically enrolled in pensions from April next year.

However, the Regulatory Policy Committee, an independent body that provides expert advice on proposed regulations, said the DWP's assessment of the impact of the reform published alongside the consultation failed to adequately demonstrate why a cap on charges would have 'a zero net impact on the pensions industry'.

It said the DWP had failed to identify a number of potential costs associated with a charge cap, including the cost to providers of communicating new charges and the risk that the cap would become a ceiling, with some providers putting prices up rather than down.

The RPC said: 'The transitional costs to businesses for setting up alternative pension provision were not adequately identified.'

It added that it was not clear how the cost per employer was derived. 'The impact assessment should present this information clearly to ensure that the estimates and assumptions can be tested effectively through consultation,' the RPC said.

As a result, the committee gave the consultation a warning 'red' rating.

Responding to the rating, a DWP spokeswoman said: 'We do not agree with this rating, which has no implications either for our proposals or for the consultation process.

'The reason for consulting on a charge cap was to gather evidence about the potential impact of our proposals on savers and the industry. Our final decision will be based on evidence we have received, not on our initial impact assessment.'

But Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown an independent financial advisers said the DWP had conducted the consultation too quickly.

He said: 'If the impact assessment figures were wrong then everyone involved in the consultation including employers, pension providers and the DWP's own officials will have to reconsider their conclusions from the consultation.

'This will almost certainly mean a delay in the introduction of any charge cap on pensions, if one is introduced at all,' he added.

This article appeared in our December 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
12
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
121065

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£80000 - £130000 per annum + bonus + benefits
Reference
121064

Make the switch from Pensions > Life Insurance

Manchester
Excellent Salary + Bonus (study support if required)
Reference
121040
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2021 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200