Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2013
12

Competition Commission issues damning verdict on motor insurance market

Open-access content Tuesday 17th December 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The £11bn motor insurance market is not working well for consumers, the Competition Commission said today as it published the interim findings of its investigation

The Office of Fair Trading asked the commission to look at the motor insurance market in September 2012 following concerns that competition in the market was being distorted. Now the first phase of its work is complete, it will turn its attention to ways in which the costs of premiums can be reduced.

Publishing provisional conclusions today, the Competition Commission said complex settlement chains had caused motor insurance premiums to balloon unnecessarily. 

A system in which one insurer organises repairs and replacement vehicles and the other insurer foots the bill creates a chain of interactions that result in higher costs, it found. There is no incentive for the organising insurer to keep costs down because they are not responsible for paying out, the commission said. 

These extra costs are eventually passed down to the customer in the form of higher premiums, an amount the commission estimated at between £150m and £200m a year.

Alasdair Smith, Competition Commission deputy chair and chair of the private motor insurance investigation group, said: 'Our provisional view is that many drivers of the UK's 25 million privately registered cars are footing the bill for unnecessary costs incurred during the claims process following an accident. These costs are initially borne by the insurers of at-fault drivers, but they feed through into increased car insurance premiums for all drivers.'

Smith added: 'There is insufficient incentive for insurers to keep costs down even though they are themselves on the receiving end of the problem,' he said.

The commission published a Notice of possible remedies that could improve competition and address the issues it has identified in the provisional findings. These included tackling the problems associated with separation of cost control and liability by either making a driver's own insurer responsible for providing a replacement vehicle or by giving at-fault insurers greater opportunity to take control over managing claims. In addition, there could be caps place on the costs of providing a replacement vehicle, on repair costs and compulsory audits of repair quality.

Interested parties are invited to respond to the Notice of possible remedies by 17 January 2014 and to the provisional findings report by February 7.

Commenting on the provisional findings, Murray Raisbeck a partner in the insurance team at KPMG, said competitive market forces and technological change would continue to exert greater pressure on premiums than the commission's proposed reforms.  

He said: 'We have already seen how powerful these forces are, evidenced by the average premium reductions we have witnessed in the market during 2013.'

But KPMG welcomed the fact that the commission's findings were not purely focused on motor insurance pricing. 

'It is also comforting to see alignment in the regulatory agenda; as the Competition Commission's findings are consistent with the areas that the Financial Conduct Authority are focusing on, as well as with the recently implemented Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act reforms,’ said Raisbeck.

This article appeared in our December 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
12
Topics
General Insurance

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Catastrophe Analyst

London, England
£70000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
146055

Catastrophe Analyst

London, England
Up to £50000 per annum + + Bonus
Reference
146053

Principal Pricing Analyst

England, London
£60000 - £70000 per annum
Reference
146052
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ