Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2013
11

TPR issues refreshed good practice guide for DC trustees

Open-access content 22nd November 2013

The Pensions Regulator's new code of practice for trustees of defined contribution trust-based pension schemes has come into force

It sets out practical guidance on how pension trustees can meet the underlying requirements of pension's legislation. 

The regulator said it was concerned that opaque costs and charges deducted from a member's fund could have a significant impact upon the value of their pension and wanted to help trustees capture the total cost and benefits of scheme membership in a way that will demonstrate its value for money for members. 

From next year, the regulator plans to undertake thematic reviews of the extent to which trust-based DC schemes are compliant with pensions legislation and associated good practice in different areas. Where necessary, it would take enforcement action to address breaches in the underlying law.

TPR said it has also published information to coincide with the code coming into effect, including its compliance and enforcement policy for DC casework and updated good practice guidance on areas not covered by the code. 

Andrew Warwick-Thompson, TPR's executive director for DC, governance and administration, said: '[Now], we expect DC trustees to assess their scheme against the standards set out in the DC code. Our aim is to protect retirement savers and to ensure their money is invested in good quality schemes that are well-run in the members' best interests. Schemes that fall short of these standards should expect some difficult questions, and they may incur enforcement action in order to rectify breaches in pensions law.'

Professionals welcomed the clarity provided by TPR. 

Nick Cook, senior consultant at Towers Watson, noted that increased focus on DC pension schemes had never been more crucial and the guidance was an important step. 

'The number of DC members, total DC contributions and DC assets are increasing at an exponential rate yet the level of understanding and engagement of people in DC schemes seems to remain stubbornly low. DC members need some help, and the regulator's clarification... of its expectations should be the kick start that is needed to help make DC schemes better and get people further up the good outcomes ladder,' said Cook.

However, he warned that it was important trustees do not view it as a tick-box exercise.

At Hymans Robertson, Lee Hollingworth, partner and head of DC Consulting, said the guidance was helpful but DC had to 'to shake off the perception of being the poor relation of DB'

He said a key element of this was to demonstrate to members that DC schemes adhere to the very highest standards and quality features.

'The regulator has rightly focused on the need to provide DC pensions which are good value for money. We agree that high charges eat into your pension pot and that's why we support a cap on charges. There is absolutely no reason why some scheme members should languish in high-charging, legacy funds,' said Hollingworth. 

'Similarly, the Pensions Regulator is right to expect trustees to shop around for the best deal for their members. Consumers shop around for everything else in life - from car insurance to their next holiday - there is no reason why trustees shouldn't shop around too.

This article appeared in our November 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
11
Topics:
Regulation Standards
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Longevity Proposition Development Actuary

London (Central)
£90,000 - £110,000 depending on experience
Reference
118704

Senior Financial Risk Actuary

London, England
£55000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
118752

Senior Reserving Analyst

England, London
£45000 - £60000 per annum
Reference
118751
See all jobs »
 
 

Most-Popular

 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200