Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2013
10

DWP consults on 0.75% DC pension charge cap

Open-access content Wednesday 30th October 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The Department for Work and Pensions is considering capping the annual charges imposed on members of workplace defined contribution schemes at 0.75%.


30 OCTOBER 2013 | BY JUDITH UGWUMADU 

savings nest egg money cash pension broken

Pensions minister Steve Webb today issued a consultation on capping default fund charges and a ban on active member discounts, which hike up charges for people who have left a particular scheme.

The government is considering three options for capping: a charge cap of 1% of funds under management; a lower charge cap of 0.75% of funds under management; and a two-tier 'comply or explain' cap, which would allow some employers to increase the cap to 1% if they provide The Pensions Regulator with their reasons for doing so.

The cap would first be imposed on employers staging from April 2014 and be extended to cover all schemes by April 2015.

Writing in the foreword to the consultation, Webb said that, after the first year of auto-enrolment, 1.7 million people were now paying into a workplace scheme.

But he said that more work needed to be done to ensure that the schemes used for automatic enrolment were of good quality, well governed, well administered and with clear charges for members.

'While I am pleased that some large employers setting up schemes for automatic enrolment are getting good deals for their employees, there is a real risk that [small and medium-sized enterprises] will struggle to negotiate the same low charges or will use high-charging legacy schemes,' he said. 'When small differences in charges can make a significant difference to final retirement incomes this is an area where we cannot afford to be complacent.'

'Therefore, through this consultation, we want to assess what can be done to improve transparency in pension scheme charges and to look at whether there is a role for the government in improving disclosure.'

'We also want to test the case for capping default fund charges and have offered a range of structures to help tease out some of the various issues.'

An illustration included in the consultation document showed that charges of 1% could cost someone who has saved throughout their working life £170,000 from their pension pot. A 1.5% charge would cost more than £230,000.

But the National Association of Pension Funds pointed out that charges have decreased over the past few years with average charges now standing at 0.51%. Some charges are more than 0.75% because the services and support on offer result in a higher return on investment, the association said.

Helen Forrest, the NAPF's head of policy and advocacy, said: 'Charges should be seen as part of a bigger picture that includes quality of services provided to savers through their working life and a robust investment strategy that generates good returns.'

Laith Khalaf, head of corporate research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said lower charges were good for pension savers and should encourage people to put more aside for their retirement.

'The government needs to ensure, however, that it does not prompt a wholesale decline in the quality of pension schemes, just as millions of people are due to be automatically enrolled into them,' he warned.

'Competition on charges in workplace pensions is fierce and schemes set up today already offer members very good value. The main problem in the market, as identified by the Office for Fair Trading, is older schemes, in particular those set up prior to 2001.'

The consultation closes on November 28 2014.

This article appeared in our October 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Topics:
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ