Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • October 2013
10

Altmann calls for new thinking on 'inadequate' pensions

Open-access content 15th October 2013

The UK pension system is ‘out of date’, ‘not fit for purpose’ and could leave many savers exposed to poverty later in life, pension expert Ros Altmann has warned

In a report Pensions - time for change, sponsored by MetLife, Altmann concluded that defined contribution schemes were not fit for 21st century lives. She said that the time had come to change out-of-date pensions, especially as retirement prospects in the UK are more uncertain than ever and state pensions are being cut. 

'New thinking on both pensions and retirement is urgently required and those who want the best chance of better incomes will need to plan carefully for the future,' she said. 

The report highlights fears that the government's auto-enrolment scheme brings a 'significant risk' of inadequate pensions as DC schemes provide no guarantees and leave savers at the mercy of market performance. 

According to Altmann's report, 60% of pension savers say they do not understand or do not know whether they understand the risks they face in DC pensions. That rises to 75% among 18- to 24-year-olds, who are a key target for auto-enrolment. 

The report also included a survey of financial advisers, which found they believe just 33% of clients would achieve their target retirement income. When it comes to their own retirement planning, fewer than one in ten financial advisers said they would actually buy a standard annuity. 

Altmann said: 'As retirement becomes a process rather than an event the need for different options for both investment and income streams is growing. Planning flexibly is ever more important and it will also be necessary to find approaches which offer better later-life income prospects than can be provided by standard annuities.'

She highlighted the risks of relying on annuities, which do not increase with inflation. These products would potentially expose millions of pension savers to poor value and later-life poverty, Altmann warned.

The report also compared options for retirement income and explained why considering guaranteeing pensions could be an important part of the retirement income decision. 

'People automatically consider insuring their house against risks they hope they will never face but when it comes to their other big asset, their pension fund, most people do not even consider insurance against a fall in the value of their fund, or falling later-life income,' she stated. 

At MetLife, managing director Dominic Grinstead said that the need for innovation in retirement planning was vital and advice essential.

He added: 'Dr Altmann's report is an important contribution to the debate on the future of UK pension provision and MetLife is committed to playing its part.'

Responding to the report, Geraldine Kaye, managing director at GAAPS Actuarial, agreed that DC pensions were not fit for modern-day savers. 

'Pensions and long term care provision have to sit more closely together,' she said. 

'Successive governments still get it wrong as they should look to identify more effective ideas of how the two can be balanced better. 

'Three questions to consider are what really defines an adequate pension, how is one's health viewed as you get older, and what is the true function of a pension fund?'

This article appeared in our October 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
10
Topics:
Pensions
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

IFRS 17 consultant

Hong Kong
Negotiable
Reference
118883

Wealth Investment Associate Manager

Edinburgh, Scotland / West Midlands, England, Birmingham / England, London
£40000 - £55000 per annum + bonus + benefits
Reference
118882

Lloyd's Managing Agency - Actuarial Analyst

London (Central)
Up to £65000 per annum + benefits
Reference
118881
See all jobs »
 
 
 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2020 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200