Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • July 2013
07

Government action urged on Kay Review

Open-access content Wednesday 24th July 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The government must wield a ‘regulatory stick’ unless the equity market reforms to rid itself of ‘short-termism’ in line with recommendations of the Kay Review, MPs have said.

2

The business, innovation and skills select committee has urged minsters to immediately publish 'clear, measureable and achievable targets for implementation of the review.

MPs said the government should also state who is responsible for their achievement and the action that will be taken if a target deadline is missed.

Professor John Kay was appointed by government in 2011 to assess to what extent equity market participants are excessively focused on short-term outcomes and what should be done about this. After examining the incentives, motivations and timescales of market participants, and their interactions, Kay made 17 recommendations on how firms could be made more accountable to shareholders, including investors such as insurance and pension firms.

Launching today's Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-Term Decision Making report committee chair Adrian Bailey said Kay had sought to bring about cultural change to improve long-termism in the equity market.

There was a need for a catalyst to ensure action was now taken, he said.

'It is not enough for the government to simply say it supports Kay's recommendations and then leave it to the industry to change of its own volition.'

Among the actions government should take, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills should state what it considers a minimum acceptable level of sign up to Kay's proposed reforms to the stewardship code outlining the relationship between firms and their shareholders. Ministers should also say what action they would take f this were not met on a voluntary basis.

MPs also called on the government to commission a study of whether setting a tax on share trades, at the level of the average profit made on a high frequency trade in the UK, would improve stability.

\'We found some support for the concept of a financial transactions tax, but concerns about the practicality of its implementation,' Bailey explained. 'Something being difficult is not sufficient justification for rejecting it out of hand.'

MPs also called for a feasibility study on whether shareholders' voting rights should be linked to the time over which shares have been held.

The committee also endorsed Kay's recommendation that firms should do more to consult shareholders over appointments to company boards appointments. Government should also explain how it would deal with issues surrounding insider trading and confidentiality 'which inevitably accompany' board appointments. Ministers had 'shied away' from Kay's call for rules to be introduced regulating the pay and incentives of fund managers' incentives, but MPs said government must 'be involved, at the very least, in encouraging a cultural shift away from short-term to long-term performance-based pay.'

Responding to the committee's report, a Department for Business, Innovation and Skills spokeswoman said: 'We are fully committed to implementing the Kay Review and one year on have already made good progress, introducing reforms to the governance of executive pay, corporate narrative reporting and access to equity finance.'

This article appeared in our July 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
07
Topics:
Investment

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Underwriting Risk Manager

London (Central)
£85K-£95K + Benefits
Reference
124386

Reserving Manager (Contract)

London (Central)
£1200 - £1400 per day
Reference
124385

Life Actuary - Contract - IFRS 17 Financial Impact

England, London / England, Bristol / North Yorkshire, England
£900 - £1150 per day
Reference
124384
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2022 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ