Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • April 2013
04

Single regulator is needed for workplace pensions, say MPs

Open-access content Wednesday 24th April 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

The government should look again at creating a single body with sole responsibility for regulating workplace pensions, MPs said today.

2

In a report on improving governance and best practice in occupational pensions, the House of Commons work and pensions committee claimed the existing regulatory system had resulted in 'inconsistent regulation'. Schemes are currently regulated by The Pensions Regulator and the Financial Services Authority.

Dame Anne Begg, chair of the committee, said: 'It is essential that all members of workplace pension schemes are protected from poor governance, irrespective of the particular scheme they are in. We do not believe this is the case under the current regulatory system and evidence from the regulators failed to convince us otherwise.'

This situation could worsen now that three bodies have been given a role in workplace pensions regulation following the replacement of the FSA with the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority this month, MPs warned.

'We remain concerned about current regulatory gaps and the potential for further gaps to arise as a result of three regulators having a role to play in pension regulation,' the report stated.

In particular, the committee questioned the decision to give the FCA responsibility for regulating contract-based schemes. 'If it remains the responsible body, the FCA must adopt a pensions-specific and proactive regulatory strategy and set up a well-resourced team dedicated solely to regulating contract-based pension schemes,' the MPs said.

Ideally, the government should reassess the case for establishing a single workplace pensions regulator, said Begg.

'This body must be invested with sufficient powers to ensure that all members of workplace pension schemes are given the level and consistency of protection they need,' she added.

The MPs also called on the government to address some of the charges that can be levied on pension pots. These charges were not only confusing but could seriously impact on a saver's retirement income.

'We are particularly concerned about member-borne consultancy charges and those charges applied to deferred members - people who stop contributing to their pension scheme. Neither can be justified; both should be banned,' Begg said.

The committee recommended that more to be done to improve communications between pension providers, which, the report said, have an important role to play in determining future outcomes from pension savings.

'The current standard of communication is generally poor and often creates a barrier to employers and employees being able to understand the details of their pension scheme and to deal with pension companies on an equal footing,' the report said.

'It is essential that the government, regulators and the pensions industry ensure that employers have the necessary information in order to make the best decisions about pension saving on behalf of their employees and that employees are properly equipped to make the decisions about pension saving which are required of them.'

A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions commented: 'The committee's report on workplace pensions is a welcome contribution. It addresses a number of issues we are looking at to ensure people continue to have access to value-for-money pensions, including charges, fees and risk sharing, and we will respond in due course.'

This article appeared in our April 2013 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
04
Topics
Pensions

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Risk Actuary - General Insurance

London (Greater)
£60,000 - £85,000
Reference
145934

Project Actuary - Life Insurance

Midlands
£60,000 - £110,000
Reference
145933

Model Validation Actuary

London (Greater)
£60k - £80k
Reference
145932
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ