Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • February 2013
02

Pension funds call for 'major rethink' on executive pay

Open-access content Friday 8th February 2013 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Executive pay should be more closely aligned with the long-term performance of a business, the National Association of Pension Funds said yesterday.

2

In a report published in conjunction with other investors, including the BT Pension Scheme, the NAPF set out principles that companies should use to change their reward structures ahead of the introduction of reforms to executive pay. From next year, shareholders will hold binding votes on company executive pay policy and exit payments at least every three years, with a simple 50% majority required for a pay deal to pass.

As well as aligning pay to long-term success and the desired corporate culture throughout an organisation, executive pay and pension arrangements should be consistent throughout a company. If not, firms should give a justifiable explanation, the report said.

Companies should also make pay schemes simple and understandable for investors and executives and ensure rewards reflect long-term returns to shareholders. This aims to stop large pay awards being made when shareholders' returns are below the cost of their capital.

The report also called for re-numeration committees to justify how their decisions will help deliver long-term business success and to consider scaling back or scrapping pay awards where targets have been met in a way that damages the company's reputation.

Firms should also ensure that when shares are granted to executive directors, they have to own them for at least 10 years, regardless of whether the director remains in post. This would encourage succession planning, the report said.

Joanne Segars, chief executive of the NAPF, said: 'This is the next stage of a vital conversation with the business world about how it can rethink its approach to boardroom pay. We have become increasingly concerned by the complexity of many spiralling pay deals. We need to see change, and it is encouraging that many companies agree.

'Shareholders want a much simpler approach that nails boardroom pay to the long-term health of a business. Paying executives proportionally more in shares that are owned for a long time could help align pay with shareholder interests.'

This article appeared in our February 2013 issue of The Actuary .
Click here to view this issue

You may also be interested in...

2

Ten pension funds signed up to infrastructure platform

A total of ten pension funds are now signed up to a government-backed scheme to provide investment capital for major infrastructure projects.
Tuesday 19th February 2013
Open-access content
2

Rise to the challenge

Solvency II will require an annual profit and loss attribution. Radu Popescu explores whether insurers can learn from investment bankers, who faced a similar requirement
Wednesday 6th February 2013
Open-access content
2

The power of long memory

Faisal Zai explains how long-term memory methods can better explain extended periods of market depression compared with the standard econometric methods commonly in use today
Wednesday 6th February 2013
Open-access content
ta filler

January floods in Australia and Indonesia 'cost $6bn'

Severe flooding in Australia and Indonesia last month caused estimated economic losses of around $6bn, according to a report published by Aon Benfield yesterday.
Friday 8th February 2013
Open-access content
2

MPs call for NEST restrictions to be ended immediately

Restrictions on who can join the pension scheme set up by the government as part of auto-enrolment should be ended now, MPs said today.
Friday 8th February 2013
Open-access content
2

Insurers call for cross-party consensus to tackle flood risk

Political commitment on all sides is needed to tackle the rising risk of flooding, the Association of British Insurers said today.
Thursday 7th February 2013
Open-access content
Filed in
02
Topics
Investment
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Reserving Analyst

London (City of)
Negotiable
Reference
149485

Senior GI Modeler - Capital and Planning

London (Central)
£ excellent
Reference
149436

Risk Oversight Manager

Flexible / hybrid with a minimum of 2 days per week office-based
£ excellent
Reference
149435
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ