Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2012
12

NAPF slams European pension rule change plans

Open-access content Monday 17th December 2012

The approach being used to test proposals for a new European Union regulatory system for workplace pension schemes is ‘seriously flawed’, according to the National Association of Pension Funds.

2

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority launched a quantitative impact study on the plans in October, working with nine countries including the UK to assess the potential impact of how it proposes to revise the EU Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision Directive.

However, the NAPF today criticised the impact study, claiming the eight-week timetable - which ends today ­- as 'far too tight' to allow adequate consideration of the very complex issues in question. Many of its 1,300 pension scheme members said they did not have time to respond and some said it was too expensive for them to do so. The NAPF cited one scheme which would have faced a £15,000 bill to commission consultants to run the calculations required to give feedback on the plans.

Under the European Commission plans being tested by the impact study, pension schemes would use a 'holistic balance sheet' to value all aspects of their financial situation, including assets, liabilities and the employer's ability to support the scheme.

According to the NAPF, its members are concerned this approach is not a sound analytical framework for assessing the strength of pension schemes because it does not properly take into account the way larger companies in particular support their pension schemes.

Joanne Segars, NAPF chief executive, said: 'This study was a good opportunity to test the EU's proposals, but it has completely failed to do so.

'The holistic balance sheet does not take into account the complex structures of today's companies and pension schemes. Valuing an employer's covenant is a new and challenging task, and we need further work to find the correct way to do this.

'Pension schemes were given far too little time to carry out complex calculations, and the costs involved in running them were high. This has stopped many pension schemes from giving feedback.'

The NAPF also reiterated its concerns over how the proposed new system would measure the solvency and capital requirements of pension schemes, and whether this would be too similar to those being introduced for the insurance industry under Solvency II.

Segars explained: 'A new directive based on a Solvency II regime would have serious consequences for UK pensions and businesses. Imposing extra costs on pension schemes would force more of them to close, and could undermine jobs and investment at a time when the economy is struggling. The stakes are too high and we cannot rush things through.'

Last week, the CBI claimed the transposition of Solvency II-type rules to the pensions industry could cost UK businesses an extra £350bn.

Segars added: 'The European Commission must rethink its approach. It is time to put the brakes on and it is clear that the commission's proposals need much more thorough testing.'

Under the current schedule for revising the IORP Directive, EIOPA is set to submit the results of the impact study to the European Commission early next year, paving the way for a legislative proposal to be published in the summer.

This article appeared in our December 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
12
Topics:
Global

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Part Qualified Pensions Actuary

Manchester
Up to £45,000
Reference
121150

Aggregation Analyst - London Market

London, England
£40000 - £50000 per annum + + Bonus
Reference
121149

Senior Capital Modelling Analyst

London (Central)
Up to £65000 per annum + package
Reference
121148
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2021 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200