Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
    • Moody's - Climate Risk Insurers series
    • Webinars
    • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • December 2012
12

'Solvency II for pensions' would cost UK businesses £350bn, says CBI

Open-access content Monday 10th December 2012 — updated 5.13pm, Wednesday 29th April 2020

Introducing a new prudential regulatory regime for defined benefit pensions similar to that being introduced for Europe’s insurance industry would be a ‘disaster’ for the UK economy and pensions saving, the CBI has warned.

2

Research carried out by consultancy Oxford Economics on the business group's behalf, and published today, found that meeting new Solvency II-inspired capital requirements for pension schemes would cost UK businesses an extra £350bn. This would reduce business investment by 5.2% a year in the mid-2020s if the new regime were introduced in the next two years, reducing productivity and capital stocks.

Growth in the UK's gross domestic product would be 2.5% lower in the mid-to-late 2020s than if the pensions regulatory regime remained unchanged, the report, The economic impact for the European Union of a Solvency II-inspired regime for pension funds, found.

A Solvency II-type regime would also cut employment by 0.5% by the mid-2020s, while living standards would also be hit as consumer spending in the late-2020s would be 2% lower in real terms than without any regime change.

CBI chief policy director Katja Hall said: 'Imposing £350bn more costs on business would be a disaster for the economy and for pension saving. The long-term economic outlook is so fragile and uncertain that it is crazy to entertain proposals which would cost jobs and cut so deeply into our long-term growth and competitiveness.

'Workplace pensions are vital to ensuring people have enough money for their retirement when life expectancy is rising - so future generations are not hit with huge bills or driven into poverty. The European Commission's wrong-headed proposal will do nothing to help us cope with the burden of retirement.'

According to the CBI, the changes are completely unnecessary in the UK, where pensions are guaranteed by businesses and benefit from a robust supply net provided by the Pension Protection Fund.

Hall added: 'We have a tough regulatory system in this country, so these changes are completely unnecessary. It's alarming the Commission is still turning a deaf ear to calls from businesses, trade unions and pension funds to bin these proposals.

'The European Commission must leave individual EU members to deal with their own retirement saving systems, as they do at the moment - rather than imposing a new system from the centre.'

The potential for Solvency II-type rules to be introduced for pensions as part of the Commission's review of the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision Directive has already attracted criticism from several quarters, including pensions minister Steve Webb.

Last month, he claimed it could add up to £400bn to pension deficits, in turn impacting on companies' ability to invest in jobs and growth.

Joanne Segars, chief executive of the National Association of Pension Funds said the report highlighted the 'disastrous' impact that the potential changes would have on UK pension schemes, their sponsors and the wider economy.

'These plans would kick our economy when it is down, and the damage to jobs, growth and living standards would be felt for decades. It is incredible that Brussels wants to strip the business world of £350bn of potential investment when there are fears of a triple dip recession,' she explained.

'Businesses running final salary pensions would be hit with needless extra costs, and would be forced to divert cash away from investment and growth. Many would opt to close their final salary pension schemes altogether, so millions of workers would lose out.

She added: 'The EC urgently needs to rethink its approach and shelve these proposals.'


Comments:

So the CBI endorses leaving these schemes in their current underfunded state so that we don't have to deal with the problems they represent? Let future generations handle them. And since this message goes unchallenged in the magazine of the actuarial 'profession' all actuaries think this a great idea too ? Pity.
Anonymous

This article appeared in our December 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in
12
Topics
Global

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Catastrophe Analyst

London, England
£70000 - £100000 per annum
Reference
146055

Catastrophe Analyst

London, England
Up to £50000 per annum + + Bonus
Reference
146053

Principal Pricing Analyst

England, London
£60000 - £70000 per annum
Reference
146052
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2023 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any part is not allowed without written permission.

Redactive Media Group Ltd, 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ