Skip to main content
The Actuary: The magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries - return to the homepage Logo of The Actuary website
  • Search
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on Facebook
  • Visit The Actuary Magazine on LinkedIn
  • Visit @TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Visit the website of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Logo of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Main navigation

  • News
  • Features
    • General Features
    • Interviews
    • Students
    • Opinion
  • Topics
  • Knowledge
    • Business Skills
    • Careers
    • Events
    • Predictions by The Actuary
    • Whitepapers
  • Jobs
  • IFoA
    • CEO Comment
    • IFoA News
    • People & Social News
    • President Comment
  • Archive
Quick links:
  • Home
  • The Actuary Issues
  • November 2012
11

London's council pension schemes 'flawed'

Open-access content Monday 12th November 2012

The government has been slated for complacent and weak oversight of council pension schemes in London.

In a report published today, the Pensions Institute concludes that there are 'fundamental flaws' in investment governance at the majority of the capital's 34 local government pension schemes.

In particular, the data collected to evaluate the schemes' financial health are poor. The report also found the Department for Communities and Local Government allows schemes to 'shop around' to find the most favourable actuarial assumptions on which to calculate their funding position. This has led to many funds understating the real value of their pension liabilities, the researchers warn.

The report said that, compared with the job the Pensions Regulator does in the private sector, the DCLG is 'weak and complacent'.

Local authority pensions committees are criticised for being insufficiently challenging of the advice received from actuarial and investment consultants and of under-performing asset managers. The high turnover of councillors on the bodies also weakens the committees' experience and expertise, according to the report.

Report author David Blake, director of the Pensions Institute and professor of pensions economics at Cass Business School, said: 'Given the insecurity private sector employees face as a result of the replacement of defined benefit with defined contribution schemes, it is shocking to see the government's complacency in terms of the regulation of the gold-plated local government schemes.'

He added that the London schemes were particularly at risk because they were so small, with half of them worth less than £500m at the last valuation. 'This denies them the opportunities conferred by scale, which is enjoyed by many of the non-London schemes,' he said.

'The government has a choice: sort out investment governance and regulation in local government pension schemes or make further reforms to the pensions provided by these schemes, bearing in mind that in the private sector DB has gone for good.'

Responding to the report's criticism, a DCLG spokesman said it was for councils to properly administer their pension schemes.

'Strict government rules already require councils to be transparent about all investment decisions and how schemes are managed. These will be strengthened further by the Public Service Bill, which will introduce independent oversight of council funds to ensure a greater consistency and to prevent risks being taken with taxpayers' money,' he said.

The London Pension Fund Authority welcomed the report, saying it had been encouraging debate on ways to improve governance across the London schemes.

LPFA chief executive Mike Taylor said: 'If we were starting again in 1965, we would be unlikely to create 34 funds in London in this manner and we believe a single fund of some £25bn would generate significant savings over the current arrangements.'

But Taylor disputed the Pensions Institute's assessment that local government schemes were 'gold-plated'. He said: 'The recent review carried out by Lord Hutton suggested that the average LGPS pension in payment was around £4,000. This is lower than the unfunded public sector schemes and provides a vital income to many local government workers on retirement.'

This article appeared in our November 2012 issue of The Actuary.
Click here to view this issue
Filed in:
11
Topics:
Regulation Standards

You might also like...

Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linked in
  • Mail
  • Print

Latest Jobs

Senior Capital Actuary

London (Central)
£90000 - £110000 per annum + + bonus + benefits
Reference
121065

Reinsurance Pricing Actuary

London (Central)
£80000 - £130000 per annum + bonus + benefits
Reference
121064

Make the switch from Pensions > Life Insurance

Manchester
Excellent Salary + Bonus (study support if required)
Reference
121040
See all jobs »
 
 

Today's top reads

 
 

Sign up to our newsletter

News, jobs and updates

Sign up

Subscribe to The Actuary

Receive the print edition straight to your door

Subscribe
Spread-iPad-slantB-june.png

Topics

  • Data Science
  • Investment
  • Risk & ERM
  • Pensions
  • Environment
  • Soft skills
  • General Insurance
  • Regulation Standards
  • Health care
  • Technology
  • Reinsurance
  • Global
  • Life insurance
​
FOLLOW US
The Actuary on LinkedIn
@TheActuaryMag on Twitter
Facebook: The Actuary Magazine
CONTACT US
The Actuary
Tel: (+44) 020 7880 6200
​

IFoA

About IFoA
Become an actuary
IFoA Events
About membership

Information

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Think Green

Get in touch

Contact us
Advertise with us
Subscribe to The Actuary Magazine
Contribute

The Actuary Jobs

Actuarial job search
Pensions jobs
General insurance jobs
Solvency II jobs

© 2021 The Actuary. The Actuary is published on behalf of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries by Redactive Publishing Limited, Level 5, 78 Chamber Street, London, E1 8BL. Tel: 020 7880 6200